Joe Hass, to moi: > > Bob's post earlier made me think about the idea of NSFW: namely that > simply labeling something NSFW doesn't really make it clear why it's NSFW. > For example, the article he linked to would be perfectly fine for my office > (an ad agency) because it's only language. Now, if you were to post a link > to a nude photo taken of a star who's now suing over it, yeah: I'm going to > break out the ol' iPhone and use AT&T's bandwidth to read that item. > > I've always felt that NSFW deserves, like the TV rating system, an > additional letter after it for why you think it's NSFW: P for photo, L for > language, A for auto-playing audio, and V for auto-playing video. So if I > were to link to the unedited version of Robin Thicke's Blurred Lines, I'd > note "NSFW-V" > > As with everything related to the Internet, I do not expect this to carry > on past me, but I just thought I'd share. Back to finding navigation models. >
Great idea, but now that I've seen the referred-to post in GG, I should have put the notation next to the link, not in the subject... B -- -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TVorNotTV" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
