A little trivia that will interest no one:

 

You Know Who recorded a song by Natalie Grant called "The Real Me."  At his
request, she changed a few words for his recording.  Apparently, she wrote
the song about her battle with anorexia.  For him, it's about being gay it's
assumed.  (He recorded it before he came out publically.)

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of PGage
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 2:25 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TV orNotTV] Grammys

 

No - I had many references to the Grant (Natalie, not Amy) walkout, and she
clearly left in protest or disgust, not tedium. She tweeted: "We left the
Grammy's early. I've many thoughts, most of which are probably better left
inside my head. But I'll say this: I've never been more honored to sing
about Jesus and for Jesus. And I've never been more sure of the path I've
chosen."

Subsequently she stated that she did not walk out in response to any
particular act or performance, but clearly she was making a comment about
the tone and tenor of the entire show to that point.

 

I agree that the main point this raises is what kind of show did she think
she was going to?

 

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:30 AM, David Bruggeman <[email protected]> wrote:

There's a pre-telecast ceremony, which started, per the L.A. Times, around
1:30 Pacific and ran about 2 and a half hours.  Most of the awards - even in
the mainstream genres - are announced then.  Grant could have left out of
sheer tedium by the time 5 p.m. rolled around.

 

David

 

  _____  

From: Joe Hass <[email protected]>
To: TV Or Not TV <[email protected]> 
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 11:34 AM
Subject: Re: [TV orNotTV] Grammys

 

In my Facebook feed was a post from someone who linked to the fact that
Natalie Grant, who was up for a couple Grammy's (Best Gospel/Contemporary
Christian Music Performance and Best Christian Music Song) left the
auditorium early, implying it was related to the behavior of Ms Knowles. Two
questions: do they even announce these awards during the telecast, and had
this woman never watched a Grammy telecast before?

On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:14 PM, PGage <[email protected]> wrote:

I am only a casual follower of contemporary music, but I usually watch the
Grammys. More even than the Oscars or the Emmys, the Grammys seem to be less
about recognizing artistic merit or accomplishment, and more about commerce,
for both some recording artists (and of course the companies that sell their
music) and even more for television. There is nothing at all new about
absurd winners and losers, so I won't waste any breath about that. But I do
wish they would stop trying so very hard to create these faux historic
"Grammy Moments". Occasionally something special might be appropriate, but
as a casual music fan I would appreciate a lot more if I could watch the
Grammys to see performances from current acts that I otherwise would not see
or hear about. I don't really need to see another geezer act. Maybe the Paul
and Ringo song was understandable, but the performance of Photograph was
just painful.

 

My FB feed has a fair share of Beyonce-bashing (I have a lot of conservative
ÇX FB "Friends"). Whatever. Beyonce did right what amateur posers like
Hannah Montana try so hard and fail to do. I did not have any problem with
that.

-- 
-- 
TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to