I think you're way overthinking it. My impression from hearing Corden is 
that he wants to do a "throw anything at the wall" show, and this falls 
right in line with that. That he doesn't have the chops to pull it off is 
something else.

The main thing about Corden is that, since Les picked him personally (for 
no apparent reason), he has the same job security as Julie Chen. As long as 
he gets ratings above those of test patterns, he's safe.

--Dave Sikula

On Friday, April 3, 2015 at 12:25:59 PM UTC-7, M-D November wrote:
>
> My reaction at the top of the show was "what in the blue hell are they 
> doing?"  And that was pretty much my reaction at the end of the hour.
>
> My assumption was that, much like Conan's 'fire at 30Rock' shows that 
> caused the show to be booted from their studio (relocating first to 
> Rockefeller Center itself, then to the Today Show's studio 1A), something 
> had happened at Television City that forced the show out into the night, 
> and without enough episodes banked to run a rerun, they resorted to the 
> 'home invasion' angle.  But something doesn't add up about that: assuming 
> the show tapes at ~5:30pm PDT, the sun would have still been up over 
> greater Los Angeles - and yet it was pitch black out as Corden was stalking 
> the neighborhood around Television City.  Which leads to two conclusions: 
> either there was a technical issue at TVC which delayed production and 
> ultimately sent Corden and crew into the wilderness after sundown, or this 
> episode was shot AFTER another episode earlier in the week.
>
> There were a couple of positives - last night's episode made, in my 
> opinion, much better use of Reggie Watts than the previous 5, and there was 
> something very charming about the intimacy of Beck's performance that you 
> can't capture in a studio.  That being said, the episode itself was a hot 
> mess, and Corden's format is still too unfamiliar to the average American 
> late night viewer (stoners & hobos, as SCG would have said) to go and 
> radically 'break' the format only 2 weeks in.  Again, unless this was a 
> hail-Mary to save the episode, I don't see it as being successful.
>
> David - I'm not sure I'm catching the same audio issues you are.  What, 
> specifically, are you hearing?  (Also, could it be the feed from your local 
> affiliate?  I've checked the audio on WCBS/2 NY and KYW/3 PHL and haven't 
> noticed anything out of the ordinary.)
>
> On Friday, April 3, 2015 at 12:07:45 PM UTC-4, Tom Wolper wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 12:56 AM, 'David Bruggeman' via TVorNotTV <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Tonight's edition is essentially one long remote from a house in the 
>>> neighborhood around CBS Television City.  I'm skeptical as to whether it's 
>>> as spontaneous as it is made to seem, as the logistics involved would seem 
>>> to take too long.
>>>
>>> I like the experiment, but it appears that the problems the show has had 
>>> with the sound mix aren't limited to the studio.
>>>
>>
>> I started watching and gave up. While it might mean something for an 
>> established show with an established host to break the mold and try a stunt 
>> like this, with this show in its second week and with Corden still an 
>> unknown it just seems off. The reason I stopped watching was that the show 
>> was doomed to the same problem they had when guest hosts did the show from 
>> the NY studio - there's no live audience to work off of, and that kills the 
>> pacing of this type of comedy. 
>>
>>

-- 
-- 
TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to