I believe the argument could be considered one of semantics because the
hairpiece is sort-of walking his remarks back by claiming that second use of
war hero didn't have the quote marks around it. It's total crap, but consider
the source.
David
From: PGage <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 9:41 PM
Subject: Re: [TV orNotTV] FNC's Greg Gutfeld rips own net over its Trump
attitude
n Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Bob Jersey <[email protected]> wrote:
Trump ripped previous candidate John McCain, basically over semantics about
Mac's military service, to which Greg noted that had it been a govt official
doing the ripping, the news-channel would be demanding investigations and
resignations... and had it been POTUS, "the right would be storming the White
House."
TheWrap (link)
We are still dealing with the clown car, not the actual, serious campaign for
the Republican Presidential nomination. But even for this circus, Trump really
is beyond the pale (though I am not completely convinced mainstream Republicans
are not fronting him to give them someone to look more reasonable against in
contrast).
I am interested why you refer to this as being about semantics? Trump said this:
"He’s not a war hero..Five and half years in a Vietnamese prison camp! He’s a
‘war hero’ because he was captured. I like people that weren’t captured.”
--
--
TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
