On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 2:50 AM, Steve Timko <[email protected]> wrote:

> Interesting recap of the attention TDS is a receiving plus a video of
> Stewart's pre-show Q&A.
>
> http://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2015/07/jon-stewart-white-house-wyatt-cenac-daily-show-secrets
>

Stewart addressed this last night (I guess I will leave it at that for now)
- after responding to viewer Twitter questions in a scene in which I
thought he might address the Cenac stuff, but didn't. It was in the context
of a comic bit, but had his unmistakeable serious voice ("I don't know if
they were secret - I mean, I'm in the visitor's log and they took pictures
of the meeting" - that last is a set up for a visual joke, but I can not
find the picture online yet).

Politico proves yet again that it is the worst, and Vanity Fair does not do
much better - continuing the breathless tone in discussing these two
meetings. It is a by now unsurprising comment on the state of American
journalism that two short meetings in seven years between a fake
news-reader and the president are presented as part of some secret
conspiracy or conflict of interest, while the regular schmoozing and
back-massaging that goes on between supposedly real journalists and the
high level politicians they are supposed to be covering is treated as
simply the necessary grease that provides "access".

In his opening segment Stewart may have gone a bit out of his way to
demonstrate what is clear to anyone who has watched his show during the
Obama years - he has been a fairly tough critic of this president. Last
night he used what in the eyes of most people not under the influence of FN
has been a wildly successful and morally courageous African trip by Obama
to make a point about American arrogance (Obama telling saying that
policies that discriminate against women are "stupid") leading up to the
kicker - pointing out that while Obama has been willing to make a show of
his courage in lecturing African countries, when he visited Saudi Arabia
during his first year in office he never raised concerns about their human
rights abuses (punchline "let that be a lesson to Africa - you want to fuck
with people, you have to lube them up first" - over a graphic of a barrel
of oil). True Stewart's recent interview with Obama was mostly a mutual
congratulation society, but Stewart has been extremely tough on Obama in
the past, consistently taking the view that all the "hope and change"
rhetoric of his first campaign was BS, that Obama caved on health care
reform (Stewart was one of those who made a fetish of the "Public Option"),
and that his inability to close Gitmo, ongoing surveillance of Americans
and over reliance on drone strikes makes him not substantively different
that his predecessor.

Jon Stewart has "covered" three US Presidents. I think most current viewers
and TV and political pundits forget just how tough he was on Clinton during
the last two full years of his administration - tougher than Dave or Leno
(and Dave was pretty tough, I will have to leave it to others to comment on
Leno). If he was tougher on Bush than Clinton (and he was) it was because
he had 8 years of the latter, and, by any standard that would make even a
pretense at being objective, the problems of the Bush administration were
more serious than fellatio in the Oval Office. I think it would be fair to
rank the presidents in order of how critical Stewart has been as Bush,
Clinton, Obama, but it would be unfair to suggest either that he has not
been critical of Obama (he has been, at times very harshly, and at critical
points in his presidency) or that two short meetings with Obama are the
reason he has been less harsh than he was on the guy who finger fucked his
19 year old intern or the guy who led the country into both the worst
foreign policy and the worst financial crises in living memory while
laughing his way over a devastating hurricane in the process of killing
1800 Americans.

-- 
-- 
TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to