Sorry. I didn't see these other replies two days ago. My email client's interpretation of "sort by Subject" produces some sequences which continue to mystify me. :-)

Jon Delfin wrote:
Sidebar: Just heard someone on a Food Network show say she
worked in a tapas restaurant. The CC said "topless restaurant."

I like that. Although no examples come to mind at the moment, there are often some funny captioned interpretations of dialog in video clips and shows from past decades. E.g. on Laugh-In and in news stories on "Through the Decades".

I don't blame the captioners, even though I sometimes get a chuckle out of what they write. After all, can we expect a millennial to be as familiar with rotary phones, celebrities from 40-50 years ago, pre-deregulation airlines, pre-breakup AT&T, etc. as older folks?

And I'm not prepared to turn off captioning. It is often essential.

E.g. When Colbert and Meyers billboard their next segment while heading into a commercial break, the combination of them talking fast and music playing over them, makes what they say unintelligible to me. Fortunately the captioning often provides the info that I couldn't get from the audio.

And, when a weather alert interrupts a pgm's audio, often the captions provide a transcript of the displaced dialog.

On Jul 20, 2017 5:47 AM, "JW" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

     > The third problem was related to the second. I.e.
     > while I had the aspect ratio set to "SQUEEZED", small
    text
     > on the screen was very difficult to read. Unfortunately,
     > "SET FOR LIFE" displayed lots of small text. Compounding
     > that, "SET FOR LIFE" often displayed that small text
    for a
     > relatively short periods of time.

    A large part of your problem is that most programs now
    assume that the viewer has an HD set, so they're
    designed for the wide screen. That's unlikely to get any
    better for those of us who still watch in SD.

That probably explains some of the symptoms that I've seen. But sometimes it is frustratingly inconsistent.

E.g. when I watch Laugh-In, I set the aspect ratio to "Cropped" because the "Proven Entertainment" versions of Laugh-In eps (at least as broadcast on Decades) seem to be pre-squeezed.

But a few minutes later, when "Through the Decades" starts (on the same channel), I have to change the aspect ratio to "Squeezed" - otherwise significant parts of the image will fall outside the width of my TV screen.


Despite all that, I'm still not planning on buying a large HD TV in order to make all the documentaries on PBS watchable.

I wonder how much overlap there is between the audience for documentary films and the audience of home viewers who have old TVs. And I wonder how effectively the buyers for PBS (and related organizations) are connecting with that overlapping audience.


--
Eddie

--
--
TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to