On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 11:11 PM Steve Timko <[email protected]> wrote:
> Roseanne Barr return possible, but lesser platform likely > Two things worth mentioning. First, every major and most minor companies now have clauses in all contracts regarding hate speech and social media, beyond a standard morals clause. In Trump’s America I don’t rule anything out, but anybody who hires her has to know that — at least for the foreseeable future — she is toxic, and anybody she interacts with while employed by a company would be able to add that company to any lawsuits related to her outbursts, past, present, or future. Second, in Hollywood, there are times when one might take a small pay cut (i.e. for an Indie film or a “labor of love” project), but for Roseanne to go the route of lesser media (i.e. The Blaze or Brietbart or whatever Bond turns out to be), she would effectively be slashing her price forever. I realize she currently has nobody representing her, but no agent in his or her right mind would advise her to do that. Again, not saying that won’t happen, but you can count those who emerged from the “new media” rabbit hole on one hand. Roseanne is currently content to piss into the Twitter wind. Seen it before (Charlie Sheen)... all the ego stroking, and no actual responsibilities. She gets the attention she craves, and the rest of us can block her. That seems a fitting end to her career. > By ANDREW DALTON > AP Entertainment Writer > LOS ANGELES (AP) - After her network dropped her show, streaming services > dropped her reruns, and her agency dropped her for a racist tweet, Roseanne > Barr is vowing she's not finished. Whether anyone will have her is an open > question. > Experts say network TV, where she saw huge success both on the original > "Roseanne" and the recent reboot, is not really a possibility now. > Eric Dezenhall, who runs a crisis-management firm, says if she's willing > to make less money there are outlets including streaming services and > podcasts where her style of outrageous statements would be encouraged. > Barr has already received one offer: A former aide from the President > Donald Trump campaign says he's starting a streaming service called Bond > later in June and had considered her as a contributor even before her > show's cancellation. > > > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 8:03 PM, PGage <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I also saw his interview with Cooper. Arnold knows what most of us know, >> only more personally; Roseanne is not well, and the people who care about >> her and encouraged her to do this reboot did not serve her interests. I’m >> not sure about the idea of intentional sabotage, but part of her pattern >> is being self-destructive, and the probability of doing so get stronger the >> more attention and pressure she has. >> >> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 4:15 PM Doug Eastick <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Tom Arnold was on Anderson Cooper Wednesday night. It was not a short >>> segment. He really did sound rational and also checked in with his step >>> children. >>> >>> He said that her son had access to her Twitter account and would >>> moderate it somewhat, or at least had the access to. >>> >>> He also put a some blame on ABC for restarting the show. Once >>> >>> >>> On Thu, May 31, 2018, 5:16 PM Tom Wolper, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 5:08 PM PGage <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> This is one of the all time great corporate uses of social media in >>>>> defense of their brand. It also sharpens the point: >>>>> >>>>> The problem with Roseanne is not her racist, anti-Semitic and >>>>> Islamaphobic beliefs; she has been clear about these for some time, and if >>>>> they were the problem she would never have gotten another gig at ABC. The >>>>> problem is her impaired judgment in sharing these beliefs while starring >>>>> in >>>>> a hit network show. She promised she would not do this, but could not keep >>>>> her promise. I blame her poor mental health, she is trying to blame >>>>> Ambien. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I hate to think of Tom Arnold as the voice of reason. But he does make >>>> some solid points in this Hollywood Reporter article, namely that Roseanne >>>> tweeted as an act of self-sabotage and a way of getting out of the show. He >>>> said if the show went to a second season she would have found another way >>>> to wreck it. Also he says he told ABC that they should have taken her phone >>>> or at least dictate tweets to an assistant in order to avoid fatal damage. >>>> >>>> >>>> https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/tom-arnold-roseanne-cancellation-she-wanted-it-happen-1115950 >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "TVorNotTV" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "TVorNotTV" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> -- >> Sent from Gmail Mobile >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "TVorNotTV" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TVorNotTV" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Kevin M. (RPCV) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TVorNotTV" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
