As others have said, there is no easy answer. I think Louis CK should be
able to rehabilitate himself, but if this is a return and not just testing
the waters it may be too quick. People ripped on him for doing a routine
and not mentioning the allegations. If he had done a routine and mentioned
the allegations people would accuse him of being insensitive.

With the exception of his apparently locking the door once, I haven’t seen
any allegation against him that amounts to more than a misdemeanor. Locking
the door could amount to some sort of illegal detention short of kidnapping
and that could be a felony. So I’m not sure it’s fair to refer to him as a
sexual offender. He wouldn’t have to register in Nevada or California for
what he has admitted doing. I jumped into a few Twitter conversations by
pointing out that the #MeToo movement in general has been silent on what
Asia Argento almost assuredly did to the 17-year-old boy. That could be
statutory rape. She maintains her innocence, unlike Louis CK, who
eventually acknowledged his guilt. I don’t think it’s fair that people are
throwing bombs at Louis CK and not even giving Argento a skunk eye. Let’s
be real. Louis CK traumatized his victims, while Argento fulfilled just
about every teen boy’s fantasy.  Still, it’s a huge difference that Louis
CK (eventually) admitted what he did while Argento hides behind denial and
silence.

On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 1:17 PM Kevin M. <[email protected]> wrote:

> It is the concept that the venues are in the middle that feels like a
> conceit to me. It implies a middle ground exists between those who were
> sexually harassed and “fans” of the guy who did the harassing. That’s not a
> middle ground, it is a cop-out.
>
> I would put forward the notion that any comedy club who cannot make money
> without the sexual harassers needs to close its doors. I would put forward
> the notion any comedy club who cannot find comics who don’t sexually harass
> women needs to close its doors. I’d even put forward the notion that, as CK
> has not expressed or exhibited any signs of changed behavior, booking him
> to perform presents a massive liability issue.
>
> People deserve second chances, but before you make with the yuk-yuks, take
> some ownership of your past misdeeds, show some degree of remorse or
> regret, demonstrate a willingness to change. This just felt like “Well it’s
> been a year, time to get back at it.”
>
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 1:03 PM Tom Wolper <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 5:06 AM Adam Bowie <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I honestly don't know how Louis CK could continue his career at this
>>> point. I would think it'd take a wait of years rather than months. And he
>>> might want to do things very differently when he tries to reboot.
>>>
>>> I suppose it's like the thorny issue of reformed sex offenders. They
>>> need to re-enter society, or they simply become a permanent burden on the
>>> state, and so they need to be allowed to get a job and a home. But I'm not
>>> going to be happy that they're working alongside me, or living next door.
>>>
>>
>> Let's remember that these things are a process and they don't proceed in
>> a linear fashion. While the Bill Cosby story was breaking he was on tour.
>> He continued doing dates and drawing crowds even as the number of accusers
>> mushroomed.
>>
>> Louis CK has fans who want to see him perform no matter what he's done
>> and they're willing to shame victims for keeping him away. There are also
>> many, many people who take the side of the victims and are not prepared to
>> go to a club or watch a show featuring CK. The venues and entertainment
>> companies are in the middle and they will react to feedback they get
>> whenever he appears.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "TVorNotTV" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
> --
> Kevin M. (RPCV)
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "TVorNotTV" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to