The comedian who did the Apu documentary sides with Marc Lamont Hill,
criticizes CNN.
LINK TO TWEET <https://twitter.com/harikondabolu/status/1069348896986537986>

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 12:12 PM Kevin M. <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks for that. As I said, I’d never heard of the guy, but didn’t see
> what he said in an isolated speech as especially inflammatory. Now I know.
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 8:59 AM PGage <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> So, here is what I think you are missing:
>> 1. While saying he advocates and promotes non-violence, he rejected a
>> definition of this that excluded Palestinians using violence to resist
>> Israeli state violence. If all he meant by this was that when the Israeli
>> military sends soldiers or bombs to the West Bank or the Gaza Strip the
>> Palestinians should be allowed to fight back, it would be relatively
>> uncontroversial. But he clearly meant something different - that in his
>> view there were times when it was morally acceptable, perhaps imperative,
>> for the Palestinians to blow up city buses as a means of resisting Israeli
>> state violence. If you do not understand what is controversial about this
>> position, simply imagine that instead he was saying that there were times
>> when Palestinians would be justified in hijcking commercial airliners and
>> flying them into crowded US landmarks. The reaction in Israel is even
>> stronger, since they have been dealing with this longer and more frequently.
>>
>> 2. He used the phrase “from the river to the sea” - when he called for a
>> “free Palestine from the river to the sea.” This phrase is a term of art in
>> the Middle East, and a dog whistle that has a very specific meaning (I
>> guess it is not really a dog whistle, since in the context of the Middle
>> East everyone would know what it means, not just dogs. But in the US its
>> meaning is less clear). The River is the Jordan, and the Sea is the
>> Mediterranean. Right now the land between those two is mostly called the
>> state of Israel. WHen people call for a free Palestine to exist between the
>> River and the Sea, they are actually saying that the State of Israel has no
>> right to exist, and that it should be replaced by the State of Palestine.
>> Moreover, this phrase is associated with groups like Hamas, which not only
>> refuse to recognize the right of Israel to exist, but are actively devoted
>> to using violence to eliminate it.  Many, including the US, the EU and
>> Israel, regard Hamas as a terrorist organization.  In using this phrase,
>> Hill is not campaigning for a Palestinian State, he is campaigning against
>> the existence of the State of Israel. These are two very different things.
>>
>> 3. Hill has been photographed socializing with Minister Louis Farrakhan,
>> and when criticized for it has pushed back hard, saying he will not allow
>> the media to dictate who he gets photographed with or socializes with.
>> Farrakhan, by any measure, is an anti-Semite and a racist. Hill’s
>> association with Farrakhan does not by itself justify banning him from CNN
>> of course, and there is a long list of Democratic figures (including anyone
>> who was at Aretha Franklin’s funeral) who are included among the many who
>> have been photographed with him. But Hill’s attitude about this provide
>> some of the context for making sense of his recent comments.
>>
>> In all of this Hill is like nothing so much as Donald Trump and his
>> enablers, who from one side of their mouth weakly endorse vague cliches
>> about not being racist, while from the bigger side of their mouth they
>> exuse, endorse and subtly repeat racist leaders, organizations and dog
>> whistles. If a Fox News Commentator said he was opposed to racist violence,
>> but then said he wa not going to be bullied into condemning people like
>> Dylann Roof for shooting all those people at Emanuel AFrican Methodist
>> Episcopal Church, because America is a white Christian nation that needs to
>> be defended, and then repeared racist code phraes and defended himself for
>> hanging out with David Duke, saying that while he disagreed with lynching,
>> he agreed with Duke about lots of other things, I think you would find lots
>> of reasonable Americans calling on Fox News to fire that Commentator
>> (though of course I know I am probably describing an actual Commentator at
>> FN who has not been fired).
>>
>> I agree that it is possible to harshly and criticize Israel and its
>> immoral, oppressive polices (like the settlements) especially under its
>> current government, without being anti-Semitic. I identify myself as such a
>> critic. I also agree that there are those Israelis and supporters who do
>> not seem to accept this. But I do think it is more likely that people who
>> advocate for the use of violent terrorism, the destruction of the state of
>> Israel, and defend Louis Farrakhan, can reasonably be described as
>> anti-Semitic.
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 6:25 PM Kevin M. <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I’d never even heard of the guy until this afternoon. Not sure what he
>>> does, and not sure why he was speaking at the UN. But once again, because
>>> Israel has no separation of church and state, it is assumed that those who
>>> speak against the Israeli government’s history of discrimination and abuse
>>> are therefore anti-semitic, so when he advocated violence as an option for
>>> the Palestinians, CNN sacked him. Let me be clear: I naturally assume he is
>>> as big a gasbag as every other CNN pundit, and there’s always a good reason
>>> to fire a gasbag pundit regardless of party affiliation. But I listened to
>>> his speech at the UN; it was bold, but he said nothing against Jews.
>>> Supposedly his words echoed rhetoric by those campaigning for a Palestinian
>>> state. OK, I don’t know that, but is that alone something to be fired over?
>>> What am I missing here?
>>>
>>> https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/29/media/marc-lamont-hill-cnn/index.html
>>> --
>>> Kevin M. (RPCV)
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "TVorNotTV" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>
>>> --
>> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "TVorNotTV" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
> --
> Kevin M. (RPCV)
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "TVorNotTV" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to