With Weinstein, Farrow was a David who slew Goliath. Since then the quality of his villains has declined. At least twice I saw him having to explain why his target's actions were bad. He ran out of obvious targets. It reminds me of Siskel and Ebert saying the quality of Bond films was determined by the caliber of the villains. Farrow had third-rate villains he tried to build up into Goldfingers. On May 18, 2020, 3:07 AM -0700, 'Dave Sikula' via TVorNotTV <[email protected]>, wrote: > Farrow lost any credibility for me when he went after his alleged father and > ignored any evidence that cleared him in favor of concentrating on rumor, > innuendo, and the poison his mother had injected into many of her children's > minds. > > --Dave Sikula > > On Monday, May 18, 2020 at 12:14:56 AM UTC-7, PGage wrote: > > Ben Smith in this NYT Piece gets squarely at an issue that has been > > discussed indirectly in several ways on this list over last few years. I > > strongly recommend reading in its entirety (a few fair use excerpt ps > > follow below). > > > > > > -- > > Sent from Gmail Mobile > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TVorNotTV" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/b6a57144-c24f-41fc-9a33-521e20faade8%40googlegroups.com.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TVorNotTV" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/39cd4f8e-6688-4a2a-9839-3b88c92c04f2%40Spark.
