Disclaimer: I have never seen either Birth Of A Nation nor Gone With The
Wind, nor do I have any plan to do so at this time. With that out of the
way, and returning briefly to the specific decision:

There was an earlier point made by PGage Wednesday night that the headline
was misleading, because WarnerMedia promised "it will return with a
discussion of its historical context and a denouncement of those very
depictions."

To which my response is:
1. Given that it would take about a day to create an intertitle that says
the first two sentences from the statement spoken to Variety in their item,
with a link to hbomax.com/gwtw, which could start with a link to the
Analysis section of the existing Wikipedia entry about the film and grow
from there, I fail to see how there's a need to pull the film (it ain't
like we didn't know this was a problem on June 8);
2. The failure to provide a definitive return date given the reasonably
extensive content that a simple Google search returns on the topic leads me
to believe that the actual goal is to not return this film to the library
and let it go away;
3. If a viewer is really committed to spending three-and-two-thirds hours
on an 81-year-old film, I'm guessing they know the metaphorical score
already.


On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 7:58 AM Tom Wolper <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 5:40 AM 'Dave Sikula' via TVorNotTV <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I've seen it two or three times (nearly getting into a fight the last
>> time I saw it in a theatre) and, its racial politics aside, find it a lousy
>> movie. It's bloated, all of the characters are static, ending up either
>> dead or exactly where they started psychologically, and the two male leads
>> obviously dislike their characters. McDaniel struggles bravely with her
>> role, but there really is little of value in the whole thing.
>>
>
> In the days before TV there was just the movie theater. And the movie
> playing there changed frequently, so if one missed a movie during its run
> it was conceivable that one would never see it. And over the course of time
> moviegoers would have seen many movies that they would have forgotten soon
> after they left the theater and a few that stuck with them for months or
> years afterward. GWTW is one of those movies that stuck with viewers and
> got into the lists of best movies over the decades. A lot of that had to do
> with people who loved the book and were happy to see how it was brought to
> the screen and a lot were swept away from the romance. Today, with access
> to the movie, as well as film criticism, only a click away, we can form a
> different impression of GWTW. When the question of repertory movie theaters
> booking GWTW came up a couple of years ago I realized that I saw the movie
> when it was a massive event on network TV back in 1978 or so. Then it was
> shown on two nights and broken up for commercials. So I got a DVD from a
> used book store and then watched the movie and a commentary track from a
> film historian.
>
> I agree with Dave's assessment. The script went through several hands and
> the movie went through different directors and it shows. They were over
> budget and rushed for time and a lot of sloppiness remains in the film. One
> scene that sticks out to me was a scene with Scarlett and Ashley in a barn.
> Through the whole scene Leslie Howard talks with an English accent. I can't
> understand why they would print that and not do another take.
>
> I've also seen Birth of a Nation and I realized while watching GWTW that a
> lot of Griffith's visual language was copied into it. Since there was a 24
> year gap between the movies I'm not sure if it was expected that viewers
> would resonate with those cues or just that was the way the era was going
> to be depicted.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "TVorNotTV" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAJE-FiFpa8X9nVj8S1L4XwcUaTx6%3DaY4Zyyr22yoFAMTx%3Dzx-Q%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAJE-FiFpa8X9nVj8S1L4XwcUaTx6%3DaY4Zyyr22yoFAMTx%3Dzx-Q%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CABru7%2BePWxsssUUXSxijO54PDmwoX1mPRGycLPZHt7Rtma9sNg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to