She's just sharing the Vice article, which has the same headline. Credit
whomever coined it at Vice.
David
On Thursday, January 14, 2021, 5:29:33 PM PST, Steve Timko
<[email protected]> wrote:
Gotta give Haberman credit for this.
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021, 8:28 AM PGage <[email protected]> wrote:
So, this NYT article from yesterday is a classic Haberman piece (though note
she shares byline with the great Peter Baker and Annie Karni). Just as Miller
was in the pocket of VP Cheney, Haberman has been cozy with Pence, and his
allies, and I can’t think of a NYT article that makes that cozy relationship
more clear.
One of the things that makes Maggie less horrible than Judith Miller is that
Cheney was actually the driver of Bushism, so by functioning as Cheney’s
mouthpiece she was actually pushing Bush in a more extreme direction. Pence and
his allies OTOH see themselves (with maybe some, though not nearly as much as
they think, justification) as a break on Trumpism.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/12/us/politics/mike-pence-trump.html
On Sat, 9 Jan 2021 at 3:22 PM PGage <[email protected]> wrote:
The Durant example is a good one, though I think more directly applies to
Miller (who not only wanted access, but was ideologically cozy and lazy), than
Haberman (who has been compromising for access, but also does real reporting on
her own, and I don’t think is particularly Trumpy in the way that Miller was
Bushy).
I think you are exactly right that the changed climate is likely to show that
the compromises Maggie made were not nearly worth it.
On Sat, 9 Jan 2021 at 2:26 PM Tom Wolper <[email protected]> wrote:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 9:15 PM PGage <[email protected]> wrote:
I’ve actually had two brief Twitter arguments with Maggie Haberman. She is not
as bad as many of her critics maintain, but she is the prototype of a certain
kind of New York Times reporter, who sacrifices truth and accuracy for access
to powerful government sources. In a way she is the Judith Miller of the Trump
era (that is an exaggeration, she is nowhere near as bad as Miller was).
Still, any reporter, even Maggie or Chucky Todd, is a hero of the Republic in
the era of Trump’s constant war against the press.
The story I heard about the Times when I was a young adult was about Walter
Duranty. In the 1930s Stalin was industrializing the USSR and he needed export
commodities to exchange for industrial parts. The grain farms in the Ukraine
were collectivized and the government gave the local workers a starvation
allowance of food and took the rest of the grain for food. Tens of thousands of
people starved to death and any farmer who kept any grain to feed his family
was arrested and executed. From time to time word got out to the west about the
mass starvation and the Times asked Duranty, their reporter in Moscow, to
investigate. He never left Moscow (and may not have been able to) and he talked
to his Soviet government sources who denied that there was a mass starvation.
And that was the story he filed each time. When the cult of Stalin ended in
1956 a lot of suppressed stories came out and there was a lot of anger in the
US toward the NY Times for abetting a mass atrocity. Duranty was supposed to be
a lesson to journalism about choosing access over investigation.
One thing I haven't seen discussed yet is that the new Congress will certainly
be having hearings about what has happened during the last 4 years and why.
When the Democratic led House had hearings in 2019 and 2020 they got blocked by
the refusal of the White House to allow their people to testify and the refusal
of the DOJ to enforce subpoenas. Civil service employees couldn't be protected
from retaliation. All of that changes on the 20th as the political appointees
will no longer be in the White House and have presidential protection and the
civil service employees will be encouraged to testify. I expect a lot of
shocking wrongdoing will be uncovered and reporters like Haberman will be
called to account for not reporting things going on all around her and choosing
to print lies told to her by her sources instead.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAJE-FiFSFNpkc2Wwzpx8dzSvvrFq8Hr4xzDfj5%2BUKNY1cg6kRw%40mail.gmail.com.
--
Sent from Gmail Mobile
--
Sent from Gmail Mobile
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/916883271.1303630.1610688926355%40mail.yahoo.com.
