I didn't realize that the pre-show was an E!-length marathon, so I was
pissed when the two Best Song nominees that I had true interest in (Diane
"Susan Lucci" Warren's song and the song from "Eurovision," which would've
been a pick-me-up for the main Oscarcast) didn't air in the 7 p.m. hour.
I'm even guessing they aired in the half-hour in Chicago where WLS
interrupted the pre-show for a newscast.

Mark Jeffries
[email protected]


On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 11:05 AM Melissa P <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I agree with just about everything Dave said.
>
> I tuned in at 8 pm ET, the start of the show, only to discover that the
> recordings of the 5 nominated songs were broadcast before 8 pm.  If I want
> to see that footage, I guess I'll have to search for it online.
>
> That was what I found most annoying.
>
> The endless, bad, humorless speeches are a close second.  Why were
> the winners and others allowed to talk so long?
>
> Everyone on camera was just plain dull.
>
> Questlove was not the right person for the job.
>
> Not only did the In Memoriam move too fast, the speed changed throughout
> the piece (Why?  Are some more worthy than others of being remembered?),
> and the background song, whatever it was, was a poor choice.
>
> My only compliment goes to the setting.  Having spent time at Union
> Station (train trips to Santa Barbara and to the East Coast), it made an
> impressive backdrop.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 6:50 AM 'Dave Sikula' via TVorNotTV <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> In an opinion that I'm sure will shock no one, I thought it was one of
>> the most inept and pointless spectacles I've ever witnessed, and will,
>> hopefully, kill the Oscarcast for the future.
>>
>> There was almost nothing to recommend it. The format was dull, the
>> speeches too long, and -- even moreso than usual -- had no reason to exist.
>> While I certainly don't want the return of the Billy Crystal years, with
>> lousy renditions of mediocre songs, forced banter, and skits, I also don't
>> want a spectacle that has all the panache and verve of a presidential
>> funeral.
>>
>> Probably the most baffling part of the whole farrago was the music quiz,
>> which would have been bad enough in any telecast, but really entered sore
>> thumb territory because of its timing (2:40 into an interminable
>> broadcast), and the decision to suddenly decide to do written material (And
>> then it was -that-?).
>>
>> Obviously, fate -- and the voters -- didn't play along with the intended
>> finale, but there should have been a contingency plan. If Hopkins's
>> presence was verboten because -- like any sensible octogenarian, he didn't
>> want to sit in a London theatre in the middle of the night on the off
>> chance he might win -- then there should have been a Plan B that went
>> beyond Phoenix's more-baffled-by-life-than-usual signoff. (One of the many,
>> many things that prove the ineptitude of the Oscars -- other than, yet
>> again, choosing a mediocre-at-best film as the "best" -- is that Phoenix
>> has one.)
>>
>> While I did like the set design and attempt to keep things intimate, the
>> processed video (described by Harry Shearer as looking like VHS) was
>> pointless and ruined most of the effects.
>>
>> I'm trying to somehow end this on a positive note, but I'll be damned if
>> I can think of anything in the whole twelve hours of the telecast that
>> worked.
>>
>> --Dave Sikula
>>
>> On Sunday, April 25, 2021 at 9:10:30 PM UTC-7 PGage wrote:
>>
>>> I thought they did a great job on this show. Union Station is a great
>>> space (nice to have Harrison Ford reference Blade Runner there), and would
>>> be great to retain some sense of the grouped tables even when they return
>>> to the big auditorium, which is a call back to the Oscar origins.
>>>
>>> Mostly though, I loved that they did not place such a hard limit on the
>>> speeches. They saved time with shorter walk ups to the podiums, and moving
>>> the songs to the pre-show, and not having any opening monologue or
>>> production number (besides that long walking shot), bit still went over
>>> about 17 min, but for me very worth it. A number of the speeches were
>>> heartfelt and interesting, and the very first one would have no doubt been
>>> interrupted by playoff music just as the guy started talking about his dead
>>> daughter.
>>>
>>> Even the cheesy “game show” had a pretty good pay off with Glen Close (I
>>> saw on the after show that they did set that up with her in advance, but
>>> did not expect her to actually do the dance).
>>>
>>> Nice to see our friend Jon Batiste get his Oscar moment, and he briefly
>>> shared the stage with QuestLove.
>>>
>>> I saw on Twitter a lot of complaining about a seemingly rushed In
>>> Memoriam, and especially the decision to move Best Picture ahead of Best
>>> Actress and Actor. It did kind of seem like they were anticipating closing
>>> on an emotional note of Chadwick Bozeman winning posthumously, instead
>>> ending with a bit of an anticlimax.
>>>
>>> Still, overall I thought it was a good show, with mostly great nominated
>>> films and performances, even if it will inevitably be the lowest rated
>>> Oscars in history.
>>> --
>>> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "TVorNotTV" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/23c91d78-37c8-460a-b179-e962b654148fn%40googlegroups.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/23c91d78-37c8-460a-b179-e962b654148fn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "TVorNotTV" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CA%2B_fQPzsPYym7kriSG0gzbZxY%3D2boCGzihrDFOQD98%3DU4RYMYA%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CA%2B_fQPzsPYym7kriSG0gzbZxY%3D2boCGzihrDFOQD98%3DU4RYMYA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAJ_uKi-29L-5vDp7QqjsbWaLgmm-zni7P8tWLQPgZ-q41ZM8Eg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to