What I think Stewart was doing was assuming things like the existence of 
antimatter - something which has been created at accelerators for a few decades 
- were still unknown or still unproven when they aren't.  If we (or he) were 
talking about something a bit more theoretical - say superstrings or dark 
matter - I'd be a bit more charitable.
Put another way, I think because Jon didn't or couldn't understand something in 
bleeding edge physics he was inclined to think the scientific conclusion was at 
the very least overblown, if not equivalent to assertions about the existence 
of God.  He's not as critical of a thinker as some consider him to be.
David

    On Saturday, June 19, 2021, 4:46:28 PM PDT, Melissa P 
<[email protected]> wrote:  
 
 Perhaps I don't understand you, because I assume you know how science works.
Substitute "still unknown" or "still unproven" for "faith" and I'd be okay with 
what you wrote.  The beauty of science is what we don't know and hope one day 
to find out.

On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 11:22 PM 'David Bruggeman' via TVorNotTV 
<[email protected]> wrote:

PGage's point reminded me of something I noted back when Stewart hosted The 
Daily Show.  J-Stew interviewed author Marilynne Robinson in 2010 about one of 
her books.  IMO, neither was particularly effective in articulating their 
points, but here's the interview:
https://www.cc.com/video/87tj6r/the-daily-show-with-jon-stewart-marilynne-robinson
Around 2:58 the conversation turns to what may still be Stewart's perspective, 
that at a certain level science seems to be relying on faith about as much as 
religion.  He cites the inability to see antimatter as being comparable to 
arguments that God created everything.  I don't know that it's exactly what 
PGage is driving at, but I think the way some appeals to scientific authority 
take shortcuts contributes to this skepticism of the reliability of scientific 
information.
For what its worth, Stewart didn't strike me at the time as willing to do the 
work to check these claims, or maybe even in a position to know that can be 
done.  I wrote about it here (as with any 11 year old internet thing, linkrot 
runs rampant in the post) - 
https://pascophronesis.wordpress.com/2010/07/16/failure-in-science-communication-jon-stewart/
David

   On Thursday, June 17, 2021, 7:40:59 PM PDT, PGage <[email protected]> wrote:  
 
 Again, I really don’t think this was satire. I don’t think Stewart is an 
anti-science Trumper, but I think he is genuinely worried about the dangers he 
sees in science- driven elitism, and wants to set some other authority 
(humanism perhaps?) above science. This is not an uncommon position among 
certain kinds of liberals (e.g., those still losing sleep over genetically 
modified crops).
What we needed was a transition from his comic bit (however successful or not 
it was) and at least a few minutes of serious discussion.
On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 at 4:20 PM Tom Wolper <[email protected]> wrote:


.

As I watched the Stewart rant I thought his problem is he hasn't done standup 
in front of an audience for years and his performance was off. He wasn't clear 
about the point he was making - I think his point was if you say "trust the 
science" it doesn't mean trust only the science you agree with. As he built his 
rant his beats were off and as he got up and walked to the audience he didn't 
pause to see if the audience was still with him. If he spaced the buildup more 
it would have come out more like satire and less like a right wing talk radio 
rant.
As for Carvey, he must be some kind of acquired taste. So many people I respect 
in comedy talk about what a genius he is and every time I watch an appearance I 
don't find him funny.







-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CA%2B_fQPx9RFoe0at7fV%2Bp%2BZ53JsjHpT4VENB1SgNgtRYi7jHdVA%40mail.gmail.com.
  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/1130392870.921541.1624152681788%40mail.yahoo.com.

Reply via email to