And now the court has opted for the prudent course, suspending the Dad as conservator, but maintaining the Conservatorship, at least for the next month or two. A neutral, professional conservator has been named (this is what should have happened a long time ago).
One reason they are keeping the conservatorship is so they can force Dad to turn over papers that might reveal illegal activity on his part. Brittany has not been a slave, and I still don’t think using the term “free” here is appropriate. But she never should been placed under the control of her father, and if it turns out he has been corruptly mismanaging her assets, I think some other folks involved in this bear responsibility. Even so, with the recent announcement of her engagement, I also suspect there remains grounds for concern that she is subject to undue influence from parties who threaten the integrity of her estate. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/29/arts/music/britney-spears-court-decision-conservatorship.html On Tue, 7 Sep 2021 at 5:17 PM PGage <[email protected]> wrote: > Father has filed papers to end the Conservatorship, judge has not yet > ruled. > > As I’ve said, it’s not clear to me that she needs a conservator, but in > general I would think it more prudent to ease out of it, by getting rid of > the father and appointing a neutral conservator for a little while. > > > https://apnews.com/article/2a2ca49133e31af9c020a21cb29ef334 > > > > -- > Sent from Gmail Mobile > -- Sent from Gmail Mobile -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TVorNotTV" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAKGtkYJiHnNeKsvf3yQ11MQxNXk71neFYQwpM7rb4nn__Sp4bg%40mail.gmail.com.
