Well, ending the conservatorship is appropriate, but it almost certainly does not mean Brittany is free of the demons that plague her. Unless a danger to self or others or gravel disabled, adults should be allowed to make their own decisions, but that includes the right to make demonstrably bad decisions that squander resources and harm those who depend on them
Let’s hope for the best for Ms. Spears, but I would not hold my breath… On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 at 3:11 PM Kevin M. <[email protected]> wrote: > And her conservatorship has terminated. > > > https://variety.com/2021/music/news/britney-spears-conservatorship-termination-court-hearing-1235110694/ > > Why do I have a nagging “When the gods want to punish us, they give us > what we want” feeling? > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:34 PM PGage <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> And now the court has opted for the prudent course, suspending the Dad as >> conservator, but maintaining the Conservatorship, at least for the next >> month or two. A neutral, professional conservator has been named (this is >> what should have happened a long time ago). >> >> One reason they are keeping the conservatorship is so they can force Dad >> to turn over papers that might reveal illegal activity on his part. >> >> Brittany has not been a slave, and I still don’t think using the term >> “free” here is appropriate. But she never should been placed under the >> control of her father, and if it turns out he has been corruptly >> mismanaging her assets, I think some other folks involved in this bear >> responsibility. >> >> Even so, with the recent announcement of her engagement, I also suspect >> there remains grounds for concern that she is subject to undue influence >> from parties who threaten the integrity of her estate. >> >> >> https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/29/arts/music/britney-spears-court-decision-conservatorship.html >> >> >> On Tue, 7 Sep 2021 at 5:17 PM PGage <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Father has filed papers to end the Conservatorship, judge has not yet >>> ruled. >>> >>> As I’ve said, it’s not clear to me that she needs a conservator, but in >>> general I would think it more prudent to ease out of it, by getting rid of >>> the father and appointing a neutral conservator for a little while. >>> >>> >>> https://apnews.com/article/2a2ca49133e31af9c020a21cb29ef334 >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sent from Gmail Mobile >>> >> -- >> Sent from Gmail Mobile >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "TVorNotTV" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAKGtkYJiHnNeKsvf3yQ11MQxNXk71neFYQwpM7rb4nn__Sp4bg%40mail.gmail.com >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAKGtkYJiHnNeKsvf3yQ11MQxNXk71neFYQwpM7rb4nn__Sp4bg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> > -- > Kevin M. (RPCV) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TVorNotTV" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAKgmY4Ahsfk_SQc8-jcC_R8cd%3Dcw78y1xO_bqcYQrXFcGsrAVQ%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAKgmY4Ahsfk_SQc8-jcC_R8cd%3Dcw78y1xO_bqcYQrXFcGsrAVQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- Sent from Gmail Mobile -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TVorNotTV" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAKGtkYK4fnv0x9nraKzaw%3Dv775g_-_JMY_BjXAe1kYcELcwt9A%40mail.gmail.com.
