Running someone's quote by them is kosher. Sending the whole story and
letting them approve it is not. you're essentially becoming a stenographer
for the powerful at that
A simple rule for journalists is only to do things you are willing to tell
the readers. Was the reporter willing to tell readers that a source vetted
the entire story?
You can run buy the gist of the story without surrendering the story.

Reporting is a hard job if you have to dig up information. It looks like
Schefter sold his soul to develop a relationship with an important source
to guarantee the flow of information.

On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 2:59 PM PGage <[email protected]> wrote:

> Right, but this is different than calling a source, telling them you are
> running a story tomorrow that says “X” and asking for comment. This is bad.
>
> The questions I have is,  1) is this really just a one off for Schefter,
> or something he has done with some regularity? (Someone please ask him if
> there is even one other instance of him showing a source a story before
> publication) and 2) is this really just Schefter, or is this something not
> uncommon among the very clubby NFL insider “journalists”? It has become
> common wisdom to dunk on NYT political reporters for getting stories by
> playing up to special inside stories (yes, looking at you Maggie), but this
> seems to be business as usual for NFL television reporters, who mostly seem
> to take dictation from league sources anyway.
>
> On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 at 2:05 PM Doug Fields <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Maybe it’s just my lack of formal journalism training, but I fail to see
>> what all the fuss is about.  Are people confusing the fact that Bruce Allen
>> was a source for Schefter’s story, and misconstruing him as the *
>> *subject** of the story?  I see nothing wrong with consulting with
>> somebody you used as a source and reconfirming that you’re quoting him
>> accurately and making sure you’re correctly reporting some complicated
>> aspect of the story from his perspective.  Let him see the complete story?
>> Sure, why not?…you wouldn’t be **required** to use his follow-up
>> input…it’s just a courtesy call, to make sure you’ve got your story
>> straight.
>>
>>
>>
>> And even if he had been the subject, just about every big journalism
>> movie has that scene where the reporter calls the Senator whose life is
>> about to become front-page news, asking him if he has any comment on the
>> story that’s “gonna hit the papers tomorrow morning.”  Again, unless
>> there’s some sort of editorial approval deal in place, I still wouldn’t see
>> an ethical problem with giving him an advance copy of the story just so you
>> can append the usual “No comment” to the end of it.
>>
>>
>>
>> Doug Fields
>>
>> Tampa, FL
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* [email protected] <[email protected]> *On
>> Behalf Of *Steve Timko
>> *Sent:* Thursday, October 14, 2021 11:36 AM
>> *To:* TV or Not TV <[email protected]>
>> *Subject:* [TV orNotTV] ESPN’s Adam Schefter crosses a journalistic line
>>
>>
>>
>> Take a look at this story from the Poynter Institute
>> https://www.poynter.org/commentary/2021/espns-adam-schefter-crosses-a-journalistic-line/
>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "TVorNotTV" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAH5J8yzwXp8QQkLN9Bwn%2BfLg8%2B4OD-TTxN5tix3bjvgPUBGnWw%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAH5J8yzwXp8QQkLN9Bwn%2BfLg8%2B4OD-TTxN5tix3bjvgPUBGnWw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "TVorNotTV" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/BN6PR14MB161932F1AC3C4FC651A23B6BC6B89%40BN6PR14MB1619.namprd14.prod.outlook.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/BN6PR14MB161932F1AC3C4FC651A23B6BC6B89%40BN6PR14MB1619.namprd14.prod.outlook.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "TVorNotTV" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAKGtkYK%2Bfm5JGj_Bdo7b1UCFB6R6EMmYNt8TUtsOEqvSQFWYaw%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAKGtkYK%2Bfm5JGj_Bdo7b1UCFB6R6EMmYNt8TUtsOEqvSQFWYaw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAH5J8yyoHx7khaFE8NUmY91O1688uDDUR%2BC7KTy1-tEzPutMdA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to