I follow U.S. sports and sports hot-takeism in a scattershot fashion, but it 
just seems like teams and companies covering the sports teams are overextended 
financially and eating their own proverbial tales.
But this doesn't seem like a complete correction, or even an overcorrection, 
given big deals extended to various football announcers and *some* of the 
talking heads in this space.  As for the talking heads, I'd be more forgiving 
if the coverage was much more about the games and less about who said what 
about whom.

And in the actual playing space, the arms race in both player salaries and 
television/streaming rights deals strikes this observer as leading to a 
scenario where an increasingly shrinking number of subscribers will be paying 
more and more for product that is of inconsistent quality.
But absent a pay-per-view only Super Bowl or similar measure, I think this will 
continue for some time.  Because people seem to love watching a lot of lousy 
sports games and paying top dollar for it.
Maybe I'd feel differently if my only experience in a four-sport TV market has 
been Washington, D.C.

Best,David

    On Sunday, July 2, 2023 at 07:34:56 PM PDT, PGage <[email protected]> wrote: 
 
 
 We know that Disney, like other media companies, is determined to cut costs. 
But some of the big names involved here suggest to me more than just 
economizing. 
First, ESPN in particular is always likely to fire employees who threaten to 
become bigger than the brand. 
Second, this kind of feels in part like the cost of over paying for their MNF 
talent (and of course you can see the argument that, whatever the future of 
ESPN, the most important jewel in their crown will be a vibrant NFL foothold.)
Third, I wonder if they were trying to hide ongoing dissatisfaction with high 
profile talent under the fig leaf of budget cutting. Here I am thinking of Jeff 
Van Gundy. JVG’s act has gotten a bit frayed, and lots of NBA fans love to bash 
him, but he remained a real signature presence, and was refreshing in that he 
was willing to challenge NBA rules and initiatives. Even when his ideas were 
absurd, it was nice to have a presence that punctured the almost fascist 
devotion to PR that so often characterizes the Association. I wonder if someone 
highly placed in the NBA let it be know that if ESPN was looking to cut talent 
costs they would not be displeased if they started with JVG.
On Fri, 30 Jun 2023 at 11:47 AM Brad Beam <[email protected]> wrote:

Some 20 on-air names have been let go from da Woildwide Leader….
https://nypost.com/2023/06/30/max-kellerman-keyshawn-johnson-laid-off-as-espn-firings-continue/


Sent from my iPhone


  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/1113096032.899345.1688355154538%40mail.yahoo.com.

Reply via email to