I only mildly enjoyed the original. I didn’t find it as instantly hateable as most here, but did find it mildly repulsive. As Tom says, some fraction of the badness is they are still working it out. Tomlinson, who I find pretty likable outside of this, comes across as stiff and her voice is grating. I think there is a chance she finds her register and stride and reaches the mildly enjoyable level. As all have said, there is no chance of that if they keep it as long as this. Also, I think Tomlinson needs to develop a little more of an edge with the panelists so she can tease them a little for clunker jokes. Last thought: give her a screen in her eye line so she is not constantly looking over her shoulder and away from the camera/viewer.
If the show gets better someone please post an advisory here. I doubt I will go out of my way to watch it again without some encouragement. Sent from Gmail Mobile On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 11:46 AM Tom Wolper <[email protected]> wrote: > As always with new shows it’s going to take time for them to find their > rhythm and their sweet spots. That said, I don’t know how much better it > can be. It would certainly be better as a half hour show and they have to > find panel members who thrive in that format. The show looked to me like a > social media version of America’s Funniest Videos. That show can go on > forever because it’s so cheap to make but its writers get burned out by all > the repetition. > > I’ll check in on it again in 3 months to see if they’ve found their > footing. > > On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 11:51 AM 'Bob Jersey' via TVorNotTV < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Colbert has put segments on Youtube, tho I don't think he started till >> the show had been around a few years... B >> >> Adam Bowie, to Kevin M et al, in partJan 17th: >> >> I'm not totally sure why this exists in this spot in the schedule. >> There's no obvious virality to it, and you've got to hope that it's being >> made for YouTube views as much as linear viewing. Having things in the news >> to bounce off is good, although obviously limits repeatability, but I think >> doing multiple editions per week is going to wear quickly. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "TVorNotTV" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/06acfdb6-3db0-41bc-861e-440df6d553fen%40googlegroups.com >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/06acfdb6-3db0-41bc-861e-440df6d553fen%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TVorNotTV" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAJE-FiHMNgiO04%3Do%2B8y1-r6_1HgxA2iiMDcGAsW4ppnpo8Lo%2Bg%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAJE-FiHMNgiO04%3Do%2B8y1-r6_1HgxA2iiMDcGAsW4ppnpo8Lo%2Bg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TVorNotTV" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAKGtkY%2B-VAi9WiCVeJJ4xAJKyM_kC-HS%2BT6o4OBex0eNu%3DCadg%40mail.gmail.com.
