> On 19 Mar 2015, at 23:41, Christopher Armstrong <ra...@twistedmatrix.com> > wrote: > > I suggest making the default, tagless state of a PR mean “in review”, for a > couple of reasons: > > - having labels for both `needs-changes` and `in-review` means you can enter > an invalid state where both labels are applied > - if the automation loses track of a PR, we don’t want people filtering only > for PRs with `label:in-review` and missing out on the forgotten PR > > so I propose tagless PRs be considered “in review”, and a label only for > `needs-changes`.
Only people with special access can modify labels, though? > > -radix > _______________________________________________ > Twisted-Python mailing list > Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com > http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Twisted-Python mailing list Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
