It's good idea for clear what visual elements those styles applied to, good standard all the best.
I think it needs with the best planning before starting design how effects for the future... On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Mark Otto <[email protected]> wrote: > Major version bumps, e.g. v1.x to v2.0, don't ensure backward > compatibility. We've documented this in our readme. > > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 9:05 AM, John Roberts <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I would imagine it was to make it clear what visual elements those styles >> applied to, but that's just my opinion. >> >> If this change is causing breaking changes in your application, perhaps >> you can revert back to your previous version of bootstrap until you can >> properly stage and test the newer version? >> >> >> On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 6:28:27 AM UTC-7, Saiful Amri wrote: >>> >>> We hope for the future, class name is not change but for property of the >>> class is good, thanks... >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Hossein Zolfi >>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Hello every body, >>>> >>>> When I want to upgrade from 1.4 to 2.0, I got a surprising refactoring, >>>> and I see class-name of some elements is changed (for example, they changed >>>> from sucess to btn-succes or actions to btn-actions, etc.), This question >>>> is about Css. >>>> Could any one please told me the reason of this changes?. >>>> What is benefits of using .btn-success vs .btn.success? >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>> >>> > > > -- > kthxbai! > > Email: [email protected] > Twitter: @mdo > Mobile: (414) 534-5987 >
