I think naming class to btn-sucess is meaningful than just we have sucess. When major version of one framework/application is incremented, this changes will come so some backward compatibility will be broken. My question is about Css. In Css, we can join two selectors as example .btn and .sucess to create new selector .btn.sucess (This is what I do in my applications).
Is .btn-success (as an example, instead of .btn.success) a standard (In web design and CSS) naming for selectors? If yes, why? Thanks everybody. On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 8:35 PM, John Roberts <[email protected]>wrote: > I would imagine it was to make it clear what visual elements those styles > applied to, but that's just my opinion. > > If this change is causing breaking changes in your application, perhaps > you can revert back to your previous version of bootstrap until you can > properly stage and test the newer version? > > > On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 6:28:27 AM UTC-7, Saiful Amri wrote: >> >> We hope for the future, class name is not change but for property of the >> class is good, thanks... >> >> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Hossein Zolfi >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Hello every body, >>> >>> When I want to upgrade from 1.4 to 2.0, I got a surprising refactoring, >>> and I see class-name of some elements is changed (for example, they changed >>> from sucess to btn-succes or actions to btn-actions, etc.), This question >>> is about Css. >>> Could any one please told me the reason of this changes?. >>> What is benefits of using .btn-success vs .btn.success? >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >> >>
