I never understood why some framework favored 16 columns instead of
12.

On May 4, 9:19 am, Nicolai Constantin Reuschling
<[email protected]> wrote:
> 2012/5/4 Tim Gummer Design <[email protected]>:
>
> > Can anyone elucidate as to why BS shifted to 12 columns for responsive - and
> > why quite a few responsive frameworks are also 12, rather than say 16 col.
>
> Tim,
>
> 12 is divisible by a larger amount of number: 2, 3, 4, 6 (which fits
> much nicer common designs)
> 16 is only divisbly by 2, 4, 8.
>
> Nicolai

Reply via email to