if I set width in px, is it then fixed or fluid? Can then whole design be responsive?
Dana nedjelja, 24. lipnja 2012. 23:13:13 UTC+2, korisnik Sherbrow napisao je: > > There already is a grid with 1px columns, which is the grid used when you > set a width any size in pixels. It would not be practical to add another > one. > > Le dimanche 24 juin 2012 21:27:47 UTC+2, masterexmachina a écrit : >> >> what do you think about idea that whole site (this is just an idea) has >> column woidth 1px and gutter 0px, and number of columns is equal to width >> of the site? for example 1300px is 1300 columns? >> >> what would be downside of that? >> >> > You *can* nest grids but there is only *ONE* static grid. This means that > if you nest static grids, it will not produce a smaller child grid. > > If you want a grid inside a column, you should nest a fluid grid inside > the other grid. > > Le dimanche 24 juin 2012 21:27:47 UTC+2, masterexmachina a écrit : >> >> so what if grid nested has different columns? can I somehow set 2 >> bootstrap variables? or do I havet o set minimum width valid for both >> tables? >> what do you think about idea that whole site (this is just an idea) has >> column woidth 1px and gutter 0px, and number of columns is equal to width >> of the site? for example 1300px is 1300 columns? >> >> what would be downside of that? >> >> Dana nedjelja, 24. lipnja 2012. 19:30:00 UTC+2, korisnik Mark Otto >> napisao je: >>> >>> This is simply not true—both grids can be nested, as shown in the docs. >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Sherbrow <*** >>> <[email protected]>>wrote: >>> >>>> You can't nest the classic grid, since a span1 inside a span1 would >>>> still have the same fixed width. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> kthxbai! >>> >>> Email: [email protected] >>> Twitter: @mdo >>> Mobile: (414) 534-5987 >>> >>
