If you set the width in pixels, it's not even bootstrap anymore. It's just plain old "fixed" sizing.
The responsive layout is not easily modifiable. If you want it responsive you should use the standard 12 column grid. On Sunday, June 24, 2012 11:41:53 PM UTC+2, masterexmachina wrote: > > if I set width in px, is it then fixed or fluid? Can then whole design be > responsive? > > Dana nedjelja, 24. lipnja 2012. 23:13:13 UTC+2, korisnik Sherbrow napisao > je: >> >> There already is a grid with 1px columns, which is the grid used when you >> set a width any size in pixels. It would not be practical to add another >> one. >> >> Le dimanche 24 juin 2012 21:27:47 UTC+2, masterexmachina a écrit : >>> >>> what do you think about idea that whole site (this is just an idea) has >>> column woidth 1px and gutter 0px, and number of columns is equal to width >>> of the site? for example 1300px is 1300 columns? >>> >>> what would be downside of that? >>> >>> >> You *can* nest grids but there is only *ONE* static grid. This means >> that if you nest static grids, it will not produce a smaller child grid. >> >> If you want a grid inside a column, you should nest a fluid grid inside >> the other grid. >> >> Le dimanche 24 juin 2012 21:27:47 UTC+2, masterexmachina a écrit : >>> >>> so what if grid nested has different columns? can I somehow set 2 >>> bootstrap variables? or do I havet o set minimum width valid for both >>> tables? >>> what do you think about idea that whole site (this is just an idea) has >>> column woidth 1px and gutter 0px, and number of columns is equal to width >>> of the site? for example 1300px is 1300 columns? >>> >>> what would be downside of that? >>> >>> Dana nedjelja, 24. lipnja 2012. 19:30:00 UTC+2, korisnik Mark Otto >>> napisao je: >>>> >>>> This is simply not true—both grids can be nested, as shown in the docs. >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Sherbrow <*** <[email protected]> >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> You can't nest the classic grid, since a span1 inside a span1 would >>>>> still have the same fixed width. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> kthxbai! >>>> >>>> Email: [email protected] >>>> Twitter: @mdo >>>> Mobile: (414) 534-5987 >>>> >>> On Sunday, June 24, 2012 11:41:53 PM UTC+2, masterexmachina wrote: > > if I set width in px, is it then fixed or fluid? Can then whole design be > responsive? > > Dana nedjelja, 24. lipnja 2012. 23:13:13 UTC+2, korisnik Sherbrow napisao > je: >> >> There already is a grid with 1px columns, which is the grid used when you >> set a width any size in pixels. It would not be practical to add another >> one. >> >> Le dimanche 24 juin 2012 21:27:47 UTC+2, masterexmachina a écrit : >>> >>> what do you think about idea that whole site (this is just an idea) has >>> column woidth 1px and gutter 0px, and number of columns is equal to width >>> of the site? for example 1300px is 1300 columns? >>> >>> what would be downside of that? >>> >>> >> You *can* nest grids but there is only *ONE* static grid. This means >> that if you nest static grids, it will not produce a smaller child grid. >> >> If you want a grid inside a column, you should nest a fluid grid inside >> the other grid. >> >> Le dimanche 24 juin 2012 21:27:47 UTC+2, masterexmachina a écrit : >>> >>> so what if grid nested has different columns? can I somehow set 2 >>> bootstrap variables? or do I havet o set minimum width valid for both >>> tables? >>> what do you think about idea that whole site (this is just an idea) has >>> column woidth 1px and gutter 0px, and number of columns is equal to width >>> of the site? for example 1300px is 1300 columns? >>> >>> what would be downside of that? >>> >>> Dana nedjelja, 24. lipnja 2012. 19:30:00 UTC+2, korisnik Mark Otto >>> napisao je: >>>> >>>> This is simply not true—both grids can be nested, as shown in the docs. >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Sherbrow <*** <[email protected]> >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> You can't nest the classic grid, since a span1 inside a span1 would >>>>> still have the same fixed width. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> kthxbai! >>>> >>>> Email: [email protected] >>>> Twitter: @mdo >>>> Mobile: (414) 534-5987 >>>> >>> On Sunday, June 24, 2012 11:41:53 PM UTC+2, masterexmachina wrote: > > if I set width in px, is it then fixed or fluid? Can then whole design be > responsive? > > Dana nedjelja, 24. lipnja 2012. 23:13:13 UTC+2, korisnik Sherbrow napisao > je: >> >> There already is a grid with 1px columns, which is the grid used when you >> set a width any size in pixels. It would not be practical to add another >> one. >> >> Le dimanche 24 juin 2012 21:27:47 UTC+2, masterexmachina a écrit : >>> >>> what do you think about idea that whole site (this is just an idea) has >>> column woidth 1px and gutter 0px, and number of columns is equal to width >>> of the site? for example 1300px is 1300 columns? >>> >>> what would be downside of that? >>> >>> >> You *can* nest grids but there is only *ONE* static grid. This means >> that if you nest static grids, it will not produce a smaller child grid. >> >> If you want a grid inside a column, you should nest a fluid grid inside >> the other grid. >> >> Le dimanche 24 juin 2012 21:27:47 UTC+2, masterexmachina a écrit : >>> >>> so what if grid nested has different columns? can I somehow set 2 >>> bootstrap variables? or do I havet o set minimum width valid for both >>> tables? >>> what do you think about idea that whole site (this is just an idea) has >>> column woidth 1px and gutter 0px, and number of columns is equal to width >>> of the site? for example 1300px is 1300 columns? >>> >>> what would be downside of that? >>> >>> Dana nedjelja, 24. lipnja 2012. 19:30:00 UTC+2, korisnik Mark Otto >>> napisao je: >>>> >>>> This is simply not true—both grids can be nested, as shown in the docs. >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Sherbrow <*** <[email protected]> >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> You can't nest the classic grid, since a span1 inside a span1 would >>>>> still have the same fixed width. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> kthxbai! >>>> >>>> Email: [email protected] >>>> Twitter: @mdo >>>> Mobile: (414) 534-5987 >>>> >>>
