Stupid IE 10 is sending blank messages when I reply. Guess that is what I get for using the release preview. So to recap, but shorter.
I'm pretty sure it messes with the formatting, but this is also a better practice. Only use grid/scaffolding classes for layout, put visible content inside them. I would also add your own clas, instead of just well, so you can override the css in the future if you want. On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Backspace <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Ryan, thnaks (and you too > Sherbrow) > > first question - > > With this code > > <div class="span5"><div class="content well">content</div></div> > > Would this not be the same? > > <div class="span5 content well"></div> > > I am justa adding another couple of classes to the span 5. Or are you > sayin that the margins / padding in span 5 and well will conflict? > > Rather > > > On Thursday, 16 August 2012 02:14:06 UTC+10, Sherbrow wrote: >> >> As said before, you should definitely not use formatting classes (like >> well - or you own styles) on scaffolding. >> The same for mixing spans and rows. The most obvious reason is that both >> those classes have different margin behavior, which creates paddings not >> supported by the grid. >> >> Here is an example of your first code, showing the differences (you can >> see that the 2nd col is actually a span4, which added to the span6 fills >> the span10) >> >> http://jsfiddle.net/Sherbrow/**pnpUW/embedded/result/<http://jsfiddle.net/Sherbrow/pnpUW/embedded/result/> >> >> Ryan idea about giving classes to style the content instead of the spans >> is definitely a good practice. >> >> On Tuesday, August 14, 2012 12:20:50 PM UTC+2, Backspace wrote: >>> >>> Here is a pic to make it easier. Perhaps I need to use a clear fix? >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tuesday, 14 August 2012 19:31:14 UTC+10, Backspace wrote: >>>> >>>> Sorry if this is not clear, what I want to do. >>>> >>>
