There are a couple known bugs in our image processing that should soon be rectified by a branch we have waiting to go out.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 07:17, Shannon Whitley <[email protected]> wrote: > > I just discovered that there are profile images with no file > extension. This is an example: > > http://s3.amazonaws.com/twitter_production/profile_images/70479542/eliteblogger_logo > > > Is this something that we should expect? I have been using the > extension to determine the content-type. > -- Alex Payne - API Lead, Twitter, Inc. http://twitter.com/al3x
