On 23.03.2009 15:17, Shannon Whitley wrote: > I just discovered that there are profile images with no file > extension. This is an example: > > http://s3.amazonaws.com/twitter_production/profile_images/70479542/eliteblogger_logo > > > Is this something that we should expect? I have been using the > extension to determine the content-type.
Why don't you use the Content-type to determine the content-type? S3 correctly sends a Content-type: image/png header. -Matt
