Ok... So I think I know what's going on.  Well I don't know what's
causing the bug obviously but I think I've narrowed down where it
is...

I just issued the Page 1 or "previous" query for the above example and
the ID's don't match the ID's from the original query.  There are
extra rows that come back... 3 to be exact.  So the pagination queries
are working fine.  It's the initial query that's busted.  It looks
like that when you do a pagenation query you get back all rows
matching the filter but a query without max_id sometimes drops rows.
Well in my case it seems to drop rows everytime... This should get
fixed...


*********
for:  http://search.twitter.com/search.atom?max_id=1530963910&page=1&q=http

<feed xmlns:google="http://base.google.com/ns/1.0"; xml:lang="en-US"
xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/"; xmlns="http://
www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:twitter="http://api.twitter.com/";>
  <link type="application/atom+xml" rel="self" href="http://
search.twitter.com/search.atom?max_id=1530963910&page=1&q=http" />
  <twitter:warning>adjusted since_id, it was older than allowed</
twitter:warning>
  <updated>2009-04-16T03:25:30Z</updated>
  <openSearch:itemsPerPage>15</openSearch:itemsPerPage>
  <openSearch:language>en</openSearch:language>
  <link type="application/atom+xml" rel="next" href="http://
search.twitter.com/search.atom?max_id=1530963910&page=2&q=http" />

   ...Removed...

<entry>
  <id>tag:search.twitter.com,2005:1530963910</id>
  <published>2009-04-16T03:25:30Z</published>
</entry>
<entry>
  <id>tag:search.twitter.com,2005:1530963908</id>
  <published>2009-04-16T03:25:32Z</published>

  ...Where Did This Come From?...

</entry>
<entry>
  <id>tag:search.twitter.com,2005:1530963898</id>
  <published>2009-04-16T03:25:30Z</published>

  ...And This?...

</entry>
  <id>tag:search.twitter.com,2005:1530963896</id>
  <id>tag:search.twitter.com,2005:1530963895</id>
  <id>tag:search.twitter.com,2005:1530963894</id>
<entry>
  <id>tag:search.twitter.com,2005:1530963892</id>
  <published>2009-04-16T03:25:32Z</published>

  ...And This?...

</entry>
  <id>tag:search.twitter.com,2005:1530963881</id>
  <id>tag:search.twitter.com,2005:1530963865</id>
  <id>tag:search.twitter.com,2005:1530963860</id>
  <id>tag:search.twitter.com,2005:1530963834</id>
  <id>tag:search.twitter.com,2005:1530963833</id>
  <id>tag:search.twitter.com,2005:1530963829</id>
  <id>tag:search.twitter.com,2005:1530963827</id>
  <id>tag:search.twitter.com,2005:1530963812</id>
</feed>

Reply via email to