the query "http filter:links" (which is a bit redundant) is such a high volume query that I would doubt that the search servers would ever be able to keep in sync even when things were running up to speed.
Try with a less traffic'd query like "twitter" -Chad On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 6:55 PM, stevenic <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for the reply Matt... > > Just as an FYI... > > I updated my code to track duplicates and then did a sample run over a > 5 minute period that once a minute paged in new results for the query > "http filter:links" This resulted in about 11 pages of results each > minute and over the 11 pages I saw anywhere from 60 - 150 duplicates > so it's not just 3 or 4. My concern isn't really around the extra > updates it's the fact that sometimes updates are missing. > > Anyway... It sounds like you guys are working on it and I just thought > I'd share that data point with you. > > -steve >
