On Jul 31, 2009, at 4:04 PM, Andrew Badera wrote:
but why not go with 128 bit decimal/floating point precision datatypes to begin with, and never have this issue? if anyone says "overhead" I'm gonna whack 'em like a popup weasel. in this day and age of CPU cycles and RAM, you might as well go big or go home.
Because none of us will be alive in the year 58,821. -john
