ok.  i have an account that never shows up in search results or in
track.xml.  i thought that might be it, but i guess not.

Joseph Cheek
jos...@cheek.com, www.cheek.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/cheekdotcom

John Kalucki wrote:
> The account will be suspended. It won't work, and it won't be
> visible.
> You can file a support ticket and contemplate your apparent or actual
> transgressions as you wait for them to sort out the account's fate. At
> first glance this may not seem fair, but the vast majority of accounts
> that are suspended are indeed spammy, and it takes a while to weed
> through the piles of disinformation to find the proportionally very
> few false positives.
> -John
> On Sep 15, 9:20 am, Joseph Cheek <jos...@cheek.com> wrote:
>> out of curiosity, how can you tell if your account is flagged as spammy,
>> and what can you do about it?
>> Joseph Cheek
>> jos...@cheek.com,www.cheek.com
>> twitter:http://twitter.com/cheekdotcom
>> John Kalucki wrote:
>>> This is taken from the Twitter Rules, not the TOS, so this isn't
>>> expressly against the TOS. Rather, this is one guideline of many that
>>> Twitter may use to determine if an account is spammy. If job postings
>>> are otherwise good and useful, I wouldn't fret too much. But, I'd also
>>> expect that you just might, on rare occasion, may have to deal with
>>> getting your accounts unflagged as spammy.
>>> -John Kalucki
>>> http://twitter.com/jkalucki
>>> Services, Twitter Inc.
>>> On Sep 15, 7:58 am, HardipSingh <mr.hardip.si...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I am curious how the following rule impact those that are auto-
>>>> tweeting job links to #jobs and the other twitter job boards.
>>>> * If your updates consist mainly of links, and not personal updates;
>>>> Does this mean that we are in violation of this rule if I have an
>>>> account that is primarily responsible for tweeting job links?
>>>> Thanks in advance for your time.
>>>> ~ H

Reply via email to