ok. i have an account that never shows up in search results or in track.xml. i thought that might be it, but i guess not.
Joseph Cheek jos...@cheek.com, www.cheek.com twitter: http://twitter.com/cheekdotcom John Kalucki wrote: > The account will be suspended. It won't work, and it won't be > visible. > > You can file a support ticket and contemplate your apparent or actual > transgressions as you wait for them to sort out the account's fate. At > first glance this may not seem fair, but the vast majority of accounts > that are suspended are indeed spammy, and it takes a while to weed > through the piles of disinformation to find the proportionally very > few false positives. > > -John > > > On Sep 15, 9:20 am, Joseph Cheek <jos...@cheek.com> wrote: > >> out of curiosity, how can you tell if your account is flagged as spammy, >> and what can you do about it? >> >> Joseph Cheek >> jos...@cheek.com,www.cheek.com >> twitter:http://twitter.com/cheekdotcom >> >> John Kalucki wrote: >> >>> This is taken from the Twitter Rules, not the TOS, so this isn't >>> expressly against the TOS. Rather, this is one guideline of many that >>> Twitter may use to determine if an account is spammy. If job postings >>> are otherwise good and useful, I wouldn't fret too much. But, I'd also >>> expect that you just might, on rare occasion, may have to deal with >>> getting your accounts unflagged as spammy. >>> >>> -John Kalucki >>> http://twitter.com/jkalucki >>> Services, Twitter Inc. >>> >>> On Sep 15, 7:58 am, HardipSingh <mr.hardip.si...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I am curious how the following rule impact those that are auto- >>>> tweeting job links to #jobs and the other twitter job boards. >>>> >>>> * If your updates consist mainly of links, and not personal updates; >>>> >>>> Does this mean that we are in violation of this rule if I have an >>>> account that is primarily responsible for tweeting job links? >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance for your time. >>>> >>>> ~ H >>>>