I tried this with the search API, json version (
http://search.twitter.com/search.atom?lang=en&q=devo)
but did not see get any geo sub-object... is it on only for atom
output or ..?!?

™hanks,ciao



On Oct 1, 9:52 pm, Raffi Krikorian <[email protected]> wrote:
> as some of you may have already noticed, we've started going through  
> the first steps to get the geolocation API out our door.  there are a  
> few more steps in the process that i want to share with all of you.
>
> if you start to pull status objects through the API, you'll notice  
> that, for the majority of them, there is an empty <geo/> tag and for  
> the user objects there is a <geo_enabled> tag that is set to false.  i  
> say most, because, if you pull my user object
>
> curlhttp://twitter.com/users/show/raffi.xml
>
> you'll see that <geo_enabled> is true for me, and if you pull one of  
> my statuses from yesterday
>
> curlhttp://twitter.com/statuses/show/4512367904.xml
>
> then you'll see a fully populated <geo> object at the end of that  
> status.
>
> <status>
>    ...
>    <geo xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss";>
>      <georss:Point>37.780300 -122.396900</georss:Point>
>    </geo>
> </status>
>
> for clarification: the <geo_enabled> will always be in a user object  
> reflecting whether the user has opted-into the geolocation API.  there  
> will also always be a <geo> tag in the status object regardless of  
> whether there is a location attached to the tweet or not.  if there is  
> no location, then the tag will be empty.  if there is a location (as  
> above), then the tag will be populated.
>
> just to lay out a timeline -- we've deployed for internal testing, and  
> soon we'll be turning this on for the general audience.
>
> --
> Raffi Krikorian
> Twitter Platform Team
> [email protected] | @raffi

Reply via email to