i wouldn't qualify a text-only client as a desktop client :P more detail will be coming - but, in general, i would ask developers to think about privacy from their users' standpoint :P
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Cameron Kaiser <[email protected]> wrote: >> there will be much more information about this soon. in general, the >> API for browser-less apps is designed for applications or environments >> that are unable to bring up a web browser -- desktop clients, >> presumably, can still bring up a web page? > > What about text-only client such as TTYtter or the myriad of automatic > systems? Unless you make the OAuth page accessible over Lynx, which > would be cool, but I doubt. :) > > -- > ------------------------------------ personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ > -- > Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * [email protected] > -- The best defense against logic is ignorance. > ------------------------------- > -- Raffi Krikorian Twitter Platform Team http://twitter.com/raffi
