Hopefully, I haven't asked a question with an unfortunate answer. When I look at the number of great libraries with "Twitter" in the name, it would be a real kick in the teeth to the developer community.
On Dec 22, 12:09 am, Ryan Sarver <rsar...@twitter.com> wrote: > Just wanted to follow up with everyone and let you know we are still on this > and haven't forgotten about the thread. Hopefully will have an answer for > you soon. > > Best, Ryan > > 2009/12/5 Ryan Sarver <rsar...@twitter.com> > > > Duane, > > > We definitely don't want to be sending any "nastygrams", especially for > > something that helps the community. I put a note into our legal / marks > > department so that I can get an answer back to you and everyone else. Please > > bear with us as it could take a bit, but I'll get you an answer. > > > Best, Ryan > > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Duane Roelands > > <duane.roela...@gmail.com>wrote: > > >> A question for the Twitter team: > > >> I'm the developer and maintainer of an open source library called > >> "TwitterVB". Can I expect a nastygram from your lawyers at some > >> point? Or is there some way I can have the project "vetted" to avoid > >> such a thing in the future?
