Thanks Abraham - I understand this is the current limitation, however I think there is a need for the foce_login to be available with the authorize function. The authorize landing page is confusing to users who want to sign-in with an account that is different from their latest session. The "sign-out" option is not obvious to users. This is based on user feedback, and I don't think we're the only ones having this issue.
On Dec 27, 3:39 pm, Abraham Williams <4bra...@gmail.com> wrote: > force_login=true only works onhttps://twitter.com/oauth/authenticatenot > onhttps://twitter.com/oauth/authorize. > > > > On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 23:23, el moro <axel.sachm...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > Hi, i'd like to use force_login too in my new Rails application. This > > parameter seems to be buggy. For me it' s not working too. > > > On 24 Dez., 05:18, Justyn <justyn.how...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi guys - just wanted to make sure this stayed on the radar. I imagine > > > others would like to use force_login for the Authorize function? > > > > On Dec 22, 4:46 pm, Justyn <justyn.how...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > We've found it necessary to use the force_login method for Authorize > > > > because of the confusion many users have with the splash page shown on > > > > Authorize (many times they want to authorize a different account than > > > > their latest session), however Authorize does not support force_login. > > > > > Is there a way around this, or can we get a version of authorize that > > > > bypasses the "sign-out" link to get the full credential input for our > > > > users? > > > > > Many users have trouble with this. > > > > > Thanks in advance! > > > > > Justyn > > -- > Abraham Williams | Awesome Lists |http://awesomeli.st > Project | Intersect |http://intersect.labs.poseurtech.com > Hacker |http://abrah.am|http://twitter.com/abraham > This email is: [ ] shareable [x] ask first [ ] private. > Sent from Madison, WI, United States
