i'll be posting our proposal for "oauth delegation" soon as a RFC.

On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Greg <gregory.av...@gmail.com> wrote:

> However - will we ever see the ability for 3rd party applications to
> talk to eachother using oAuth tokens? For example a custom twitter
> oAuth application using TwitPic to publish photos?
>
> On Feb 4, 6:26 pm, Raffi Krikorian <ra...@twitter.com> wrote:
> > totally.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Abraham Williams <4bra...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > I would imagine that Twitter will require SSL for xAuth calls.
> >
> > > Abraham
> >
> > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 14:44, Dewald Pretorius <dpr...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > >> Interesting, Abraham.
> >
> > >> Don't we ever need OAuth Wrap, otherwise that x-auth-password will be
> > >> sent in clear text, kind of making a mockery of the whole OAuth thing.
> >
> > >> On Feb 4, 6:35 pm, Abraham Williams <4bra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > I poked around Seesmic Look a little and this is what I found:
> > >>http://the.hackerconundrum.com/2010/02/sneak-peek-at-twitters-browser.
> ..
> >
> > >> > Abraham
> >
> > >> > On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 14:24, Dewald Pretorius <dpr...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > > Zach,
> >
> > >> > > There's a soon to be published API method where you can silently
> get
> > >> > > the OAuth tokens when you have the account's Twitter username and
> > >> > > password, meaning the user does not experience any of the normal
> OAuth
> > >> > > flow.
> >
> > >> > > I presume that Seesmic just got early access to that method.
> >
> > >> > > So, in this case, user-to-app requires Basic Auth credentials, but
> > >> app-
> > >> > > to-Twitter uses OAuth once the app has obtained the tokens with
> the
> > >> > > new method.
> >
> > >> > > On Feb 4, 4:21 pm, Zac Bowling <zbowl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > > > Yes, what magic is this?
> >
> > >> > > > I'm confused. It takes username and password but then uses
> OAuth?
> >
> > >> > > > I wonder if they are injecting the username/password into the
> OAuth
> > >> form
> > >> > > on
> > >> > > > the page.
> >
> > >> > > > Twitter should really randomize that page or require captcha or
> > >> > > something.
> >
> > >> > > > Zac Bowling
> >
> > >> > > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Dewald Pretorius <
> dpr...@gmail.com
> >
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > Raffi,
> >
> > >> > > > > Have you tried it? There is no OAuth flow. I.e., the user
> types in
> > >> his
> > >> > > > > Twitter username and password. That's it.
> >
> > >> > > > > If it is indeed using OAuth, does that mean that the
> background
> > >> > > > > requesting of tokens when you have the Twitter credentials is
> now
> > >> > > > > available? Meaning, I can also now use it to convert all
> existing
> > >> > > > > Twitter accounts to OAuth in one fell swoop?
> >
> > >> > > > > On Feb 3, 3:02 pm, Raffi Krikorian <ra...@twitter.com> wrote:
> > >> > > > > > seesmic look, i believe, is using oauth talking to
> > >> api.twitter.com.
> >
> > >> > > > > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Dewald Pretorius <
> > >> dpr...@gmail.com>
> > >> > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > Raffi,
> >
> > >> > > > > > > What's going on here?
> >
> > >> > > > > > > Your credibility is at stake here. You've been telling us
> in
> > >> many
> > >> > > > > > > posts that new apps must use OAuth to get a source
> > >> attribution, and
> > >> > > > > > > only old grandfathered apps have source attribution with
> Basic
> > >> > > Auth.
> >
> > >> > > > > > > On Feb 2, 11:18 pm, Dewald Pretorius <dpr...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > At first I thought they must have changed the old
> Seesmic
> > >> source
> > >> > > to
> > >> > > > > > > > Seesmic Look.
> >
> > >> > > > > > > > But no.
> >
> > >> > > > > > > > Here's a recent tweet from Seesmic:
> > >> > > > > > >http://twitter.com/CathyBrooks/status/8570217879
> >
> > >> > > > > > > > And here's a recent one from Seesmic Look:
> > >> > > > > > >http://twitter.com/adamse/status/8565271563
> >
> > >> > > > > > > > Seesmic Look uses Basic Auth.
> >
> > >> > > > > > > > Does anyone else spot Mt Everest on this level playing
> field
> > >> of
> > >> > > ours?
> >
> > >> > > > > > > > On Feb 2, 10:41 pm, Pedro Junior <
> v.ju.ni.o...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> >
> > >> > > > > > > > > *Seesmic Look is old?
> > >> > > > > > > > > *
> > >> > > > > > > > > -
> > >> > > > > > > > > Pedro Junior
> >
> > >> > > > > > > > > 2010/2/2 Lukas Müller <webmas...@muellerlukas.de>
> >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > Only old apps can do this. New apps cannot use it.
> >
> > >> > > > > > --
> > >> > > > > > Raffi Krikorian
> > >> > > > > > Twitter Platform Teamhttp://twitter.com/raffi
> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Abraham Williams | Community Advocate |http://abrah.am
> > >> > Project | Out Loud |http://outloud.labs.poseurtech.com
> > >> > This email is: [ ] shareable [x] ask first [ ] private.
> > >> > Sent from Seattle, WA, United States
> >
> > > --
> > > Abraham Williams | Community Advocate |http://abrah.am
> > > Project | Out Loud |http://outloud.labs.poseurtech.com
> > > This email is: [ ] shareable [x] ask first [ ] private.
> > > Sent from Seattle, WA, United States
> >
> > --
> > Raffi Krikorian
> > Twitter Platform Teamhttp://twitter.com/raffi
>



-- 
Raffi Krikorian
Twitter Platform Team
http://twitter.com/raffi

Reply via email to