Assumptions are without historical evidence to constitute your guess. Mine's not. What more explaining does it need, other than a big fat "I'm being an annoying 'Calibal Darklock' WoW kiddie" sticker on its forehead?
∞ Andy Badera ∞ +1 518-641-1280 Google Voice ∞ This email is: [ ] bloggable [x] ask first [ ] private ∞ Google me: http://www.google.com/search?q=andrew%20badera On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Caliban Darklock <cdarkl...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Andrew Badera <and...@badera.us> wrote: >> >> You know what they say about assuming, right? > > I'm not sure. Perhaps you can explain how it applies to this example: > > "They'll ban an account that's borderline 1st amendment without a > second thought" > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > twitter-development-talk+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email > with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to twitter-development-talk+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
