Cool, thanks Raffi, I was more concerned if it was intentional rather
than a bug :)  Of course we all get unintentional bugs from time to
time

On May 5, 10:21 pm, Raffi Krikorian <ra...@twitter.com> wrote:
> my stance on versioning is for when something has changed that breaks
> backwards compatibility.  in this case, we haven't broken backwards
> compatibility, but a regression was introduced.  regressions can get
> introduced in a variety of different ways, and across a variety of different
> properties unfortunately.  software projects do their best to avoid them --
> but its orthogonal to versioning....
>
> either way - we're working on a fix.
>
> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Orian Marx (@orian) 
> <or...@orianmarx.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Well, I'm not sure if Rich was referring to the output per se or
> > rather that this bug was probably tied to the skip_user parameter that
> > was just added to timelines... which one could argue is a candidate
> > for versioning.
>
> > On May 5, 5:02 pm, Raffi Krikorian <ra...@twitter.com> wrote:
> > > versioning has absolutely nothing to do with this - this is clearly a
> > bug.
>
> > > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Rich <rhyl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Oh I'll add, I thought the point of a versioned API was that this sort
> > > > of thing didn't happen?
>
> > > > On May 5, 9:37 pm, Rich <rhyl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > I noticed today inside the user tags an extra user tag has appeared
>
> > > > > We now have user->status->user
>
> > > > > This is causing a crash on my app and number of engines I've tried.
> > > > > When did this get added and did I miss the notification?
>
> > > > > Many thanks
> > > > > Richard
>
> > > --
> > > Raffi Krikorian
> > > Twitter Platform Teamhttp://twitter.com/raffi
>
> --
> Raffi Krikorian
> Twitter Platform Teamhttp://twitter.com/raffi

Reply via email to