Yep looks like I spoke to soon, many of my users are still seeing this issue. I've actually handled it but Apple are now taking about a week to approve updates
On May 6, 6:50 am, Raul <raulr...@gmail.com> wrote: > We still see this issue on every request athttp://streamd.in, Also > all other apps that use twitter4j are experiencing this issue. > > On May 5, 6:04 pm, Taylor Singletary <taylorsinglet...@twitter.com> > wrote: > > > > > This should now be fixed, though it may take a little while for the cache to > > completely clear the labyrinth. > > > Let us know if you're still having wide spread problems. > > > Thanks! > > Taylor > > > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Rich <rhyl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Cool, thanks Raffi, I was more concerned if it was intentional rather > > > than a bug :) Of course we all get unintentional bugs from time to > > > time > > > > On May 5, 10:21 pm, Raffi Krikorian <ra...@twitter.com> wrote: > > > > my stance on versioning is for when something has changed that breaks > > > > backwards compatibility. in this case, we haven't broken backwards > > > > compatibility, but a regression was introduced. regressions can get > > > > introduced in a variety of different ways, and across a variety of > > > different > > > > properties unfortunately. software projects do their best to avoid them > > > -- > > > > but its orthogonal to versioning.... > > > > > either way - we're working on a fix. > > > > > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Orian Marx (@orian) <or...@orianmarx.com > > > >wrote: > > > > > > Well, I'm not sure if Rich was referring to the output per se or > > > > > rather that this bug was probably tied to the skip_user parameter that > > > > > was just added to timelines... which one could argue is a candidate > > > > > for versioning. > > > > > > On May 5, 5:02 pm, Raffi Krikorian <ra...@twitter.com> wrote: > > > > > > versioning has absolutely nothing to do with this - this is clearly > > > > > > a > > > > > bug. > > > > > > > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Rich <rhyl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Oh I'll add, I thought the point of a versioned API was that this > > > sort > > > > > > > of thing didn't happen? > > > > > > > > On May 5, 9:37 pm, Rich <rhyl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > I noticed today inside the user tags an extra user tag has > > > appeared > > > > > > > > > We now have user->status->user > > > > > > > > > This is causing a crash on my app and number of engines I've > > > tried. > > > > > > > > When did this get added and did I miss the notification? > > > > > > > > > Many thanks > > > > > > > > Richard > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Raffi Krikorian > > > > > > Twitter Platform Teamhttp://twitter.com/raffi > > > > > -- > > > > Raffi Krikorian > > > > Twitter Platform Teamhttp://twitter.com/raffi
