I understand. And I don't have anything against it (even if it will be
default), as long as it will be optional.
And we're all appreciating the library (and its Java implementation:

On May 14, 3:47 pm, Raffi Krikorian <ra...@twitter.com> wrote:
> all we're trying to do is help people standardize on how they parse stuff.
>  making sure you can represent what is a hash tag, a url, a username, etc.,
> in the same way that twitter.com does it, can be difficult.
> --
> Raffi Krikorian
> Twitter Platform Teamhttp://twitter.com/raffi

Reply via email to