Hello DZ-Jay, Aha I get it. So if I wants to be compatible I include both of them, just as your email reader does.
One more question, is there a max length fur these headers ? --- Rgds, Wilfried http://www.mestdagh.biz Tuesday, August 30, 2005, 11:07, DZ-Jay wrote: > The problem is that different mailers use different systems, so you > should consider as many as you can. One last thing you must consider > is for those mailers (very common!) who do not even include any > reference to the original, except the subject "Re: origina_subject". > dZ. > On Aug 30, 2005, at 04:23, Wilfried Mestdagh wrote: >> Hello, >> >> If I want to reply on a mail and I want to have that the receiver of >> the >> reply has the possibility to display in same thread like many mail >> readers do, do I have to use the 'References' header or 'In-Reply-To' >> header ? >> >> It seems that both are sometime used, eg I see a thread here started >> with this one: >> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> first reply uses References: >> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> second reply use In-Reply-To: >> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> Whitch one is preferred ? Or do both have a different meaning ? >> >> --- >> Rgds, Wilfried >> http://www.mestdagh.biz >> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list >> please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket >> Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be >> -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
