Hello Wilfried,

Yes, I also thought that concentrator-to-server could be direct TCP-IP
or any other kind of protocol (HTTP tunneling for example), also I
found other advantage, I could make concentrator-to-server connection
initiator, or server-to-concentrator way so this would be nice
whenever there is some NATing on some side.

WM> At first tought I should go for first solution because of a few
WM> advantages.

WM> - server updates as you say yourself
WM> - application is splitted separate according the job it does.

WM> The concentrators dealing with the clients and the proto, between
WM> concentrator and main server you can exchange data with same or
WM> another protocol depending what fit's best, or middleware.

To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be

Reply via email to