I don't see any problem truncating your file before resuming the transfert.

--
Contribute to the SSL Effort. Visit http://www.overbyte.be/eng/ssl.html
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.overbyte.be


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'ICS support mailing'" <twsocket@elists.org>
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 8:37 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] FTP resuming transfers


> Its possible that a client can rollback some part of the file incase the 
> end
> (where the transfer was interrupted) is corrupt.  Some clients do a REST 
> to
> eg. 4kb less than the current size.  I think it makes more sense to set 
> the
> position and size when the transfer begins following a REST command.
>
> Dan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Francois PIETTE
> Sent: 31 August 2006 20:34
> To: ICS support mailing
> Subject: Re: [twsocket] FTP resuming transfers
>
>>> Do you mean it could be smaller than his previous size
>>> when resuming a transfert ?
>>
>> Yes, that's what I mean and the question :))
>
> If a resumed transfer is smaller than the existing file, then there is a
> problem ! It is likely that the start of the local file is no more the 
> same
> as the copy on the server and the whole transfert is corrupted.
>
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The author for the freeware multi-tier middleware MidWare
> The author of the freeware Internet Component Suite (ICS)
> http://www.overbyte.be
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "ICS support mailing" <twsocket@elists.org>
> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 9:18 PM
> Subject: Re: [twsocket] FTP resuming transfers
>
>
>> Francois PIETTE wrote:
>>>> I reworked the streams stuff in both FTP C/S today and
>>>> fixed some bugs, everything was tested sucessfully with
>>>> 64-bit streams. There's only one question I cannot answer
>>>> by myself.
>>>> TFileStream in mode fmOpenWrite does not set its size
>>>> to current position when it is destroyed. Won't it make
>>>> sense to set stream size explizitely to the current position
>>>> in the FtpCli/FtpSrv when data connection is closed
>>>> (although I guess that it won't work in D2 since method
>>>> Size exists since D3)?
>>>>
>>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> Do you mean it could be smaller than his previous size
>>> when resuming a transfert ?
>>
>> Yes, that's what I mean and the question :))
>>
>>> I don't think so.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Contribute to the SSL Effort. Visit
>>> http://www.overbyte.be/eng/ssl.html --
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> http://www.overbyte.be
>> -- 
>> To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
>> please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
>> Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
>
> -- 
> To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
> please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
> Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
>
>
> -- 
> To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
> please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
> Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be 

-- 
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be

Reply via email to