I always thaught that NOFORMS had to be defined for its own thread-save window allocation proc (and dealloc) So as long as the Forms unit in included in the project's uses clause, I don't need to define NOFORMS in any of the threads ?
Paul ----- Original Message ----- From: "Francois Piette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ICS support mailing" <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 2:00 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] NOFORMS >> Do I need to define NOFORMS in a thread when a blocking call (Http-Get) >> is > used ? >> >> I'm using it without in a thread and it works fine (using it 2 years) >> >> I need to exchange a lot of database connections to webservice >> connections > and the main thread doesn't need the NOFORMS define. >> I would need a lot defines and undefs otherwise > > NOFOMRS has nothing to do with the fact that the component is used within > a > secondary thread or the main thread. NOFORMS change the code in the > component so that it doesn't depends on the forms unit which is huge and > can > make a program executable file much larger even if no form is needed > (typically in console mode program). > > > Contribute to the SSL Effort. Visit http://www.overbyte.be/eng/ssl.html > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Author of ICS (Internet Component Suite, freeware) > Author of MidWare (Multi-tier framework, freeware) > http://www.overbyte.be > > -- > To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list > please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket > Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be > > -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
