Shawn Jones wrote: > I have been happily enjoying the simplicity of using ReceiveStr. > However I now have a requirement to send much larger amounts of data. > I have profiled my app and have concluded that the largest bottleneck > ( > 50%) is ReceiveStr.
I think it's the definition of "bottleneck". If your app. does nothing but transfer data, the bottleneck was sure the transfer function. <g> > > My app now needs to send a large number of records. Currently, I'm > converting each record to a string and calling SendStr and the client > is using ReceiveStr. > > Is the speed improvement potential worth the added complexity to > covert my app from using SendStr and ReceiveStr to Send and Receive? Francois already answered that. -- Arno Garrels [TeamICS] http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html > > If yes, any pointers on how to proceed? > > thanks, > shawn -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
