Fastream Technologies wrote: > It is rather strange that for the past 5 years this bug survived on > our favorite compiler! :-(
I never understood why people use a language which partly consist of just comments. -- Arno Garrels [TeamICS] http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html > Thanks, > > SZ > > On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Olivier Sannier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Fastream Technologies wrote: >>> SslContext1->SslOptions = TSslOptions() << sslOpt_NO_SSLv2; >>> is the same as what I did, isn't it? >> No it's not the same. What you did does not work as it does not call >> the setter for the property. The only way to have it work is the >> above. And the same goes for your other proposals. >> >> See QC 9359 for workarounds: >> http://qc.codegear.com/wc/qcmain.aspx?d=9359 >> >> Cheers >> Olivier >> -- >> To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list >> please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket >> Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
