Fastream Technologies wrote:
> It is rather strange that for the past 5 years this bug survived on
> our favorite compiler! :-(

I never understood why people use a language which partly consist of
just comments.

--
Arno Garrels [TeamICS]
http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html



> Thanks,
> 
> SZ
> 
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Olivier Sannier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote: 
> 
>> Fastream Technologies wrote:
>>> SslContext1->SslOptions = TSslOptions() << sslOpt_NO_SSLv2;
>>> is the same as what I did, isn't it?
>> No it's not the same. What you did does not work as it does not call
>> the setter for the property. The only way to have it work is the
>> above. And the same goes for your other proposals.
>> 
>> See QC 9359 for workarounds:
>> http://qc.codegear.com/wc/qcmain.aspx?d=9359 
>> 
>> Cheers
>> Olivier
>>  --
>> To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
>> please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
>> Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
-- 
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be

Reply via email to