Just for fun and because I've been meaning to anyway I just set Mongrel up for my Typo test blog - http://typo.jasonbainbridge.com
-jailshell-2.05b$ ps axwwu | grep mongrel_rails USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND jaseone 27558 0.3 0.7 34764 31488 ? S 14:57 0:17 /usr/local/bin/ruby /usr/local/bin/mongrel_rails start -d -p 8001 -e production -P log/mongrel-1.pid jaseone 27616 0.1 0.7 34472 31076 ? S 14:57 0:07 /usr/local/bin/ruby /usr/local/bin/mongrel_rails start -d -p 8002 -e production -P log/mongrel-2.pid jaseone 27636 0.0 0.5 29020 23692 ? S 14:57 0:03 /usr/local/bin/ruby /usr/local/bin/mongrel_rails start -d -p 8003 -e production -P log/mongrel-3.pid jaseone 27680 0.0 0.6 29020 25480 ? S 14:57 0:03 /usr/local/bin/ruby /usr/local/bin/mongrel_rails start -d -p 8004 -e production -P log/mongrel-4.pid I have 4 mongrel processes setup just for the hell of it, you probably only need 1 or 2, I'm guessing from the above that only the first two in the cluster have been invoked to do any work as my site is very low traffic. I then hammered it with httperf --port 81 --server 127.0.0.1 --num-conns 10000 --uri / --rate 600 the ps then looked like: jaseone 27558 0.5 0.7 34764 31028 ? S 14:57 0:36 /usr/local/bin/ruby /usr/local/bin/mongrel_rails start -d -p 8001 -e production -P log/mongrel-1.pid jaseone 27616 0.1 0.7 34472 31080 ? S 14:57 0:08 /usr/local/bin/ruby /usr/local/bin/mongrel_rails start -d -p 8002 -e production -P log/mongrel-2.pid jaseone 27636 0.0 0.6 31976 28168 ? S 14:57 0:04 /usr/local/bin/ruby /usr/local/bin/mongrel_rails start -d -p 8003 -e production -P log/mongrel-3.pid jaseone 27680 0.0 0.6 31804 28364 ? S 14:57 0:04 /usr/local/bin/ruby /usr/local/bin/mongrel_rails start -d -p 8004 -e production -P log/mongrel-4.pid That looks pretty good to me! :) Cheers, Jason jennyw wrote: >Nicholas Van Weerdenburg wrote: > > >>Someone else also mentioned that scgi might be more memory friendly >>then fastcgi. Anyone have any experience with this? >> >> >I have heard that the SCGI Rails Runner has some issues right now (which >is why they're not letting people use it on TextDrive). Also, I don't >know whether SRR is under current development or not -- it seems that >Zed Shaw has moved on to Mongrel, which sounds like a simpler way to run >Rails apps than either SCGI or FCGI. > >Anyone running Mongrel on this list want to share mem stats? > >Jen > > > >_______________________________________________ >Typo-list mailing list >Typo-list@rubyforge.org >http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/typo-list > > _______________________________________________ Typo-list mailing list Typo-list@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/typo-list
