Following up on my earlier promise, this seems to be the issue withthe update
script, I'm goin to fiddle a bit now and see if I can't getthis to go away, but
wanted to get the exact log out there for anyonewho wanted to help.
Processing GeneralController#index (for 69.140.109.194 at 2006-03-1717:01:44)
[GET] Parameters: {"action"=>"index", "controller"=>"admin/general"}Redirected
to http://blog.kubasik.net/admin/general/update_databaseCompleted in 0.00812
(123 reqs/sec) | DB: 0.00051 (6%) | 302 Found[http://blog.kubasik.net/admin]
Processing GeneralController#update_database (for 69.140.109.194 at2006-03-17
17:01:44) [GET] Parameters: {"action"=>"update_database",
"controller"=>"admin/general"}Rendering within layouts/administrationRendering
admin/general/update_database
ActionView::TemplateError (undefined local variable or method`this_blog' for
#<#<Class:0xb7aa7538>:0xb78cd39c>) on line #24
ofapp/views/layouts/administration.rhtml:21: <%= link_to 'your blog
»', :controller => "/" %>22:23: </div>24: <h1><%=
link_to "Typo admin - #{this_blog.blog_name}",:controller => "/admin/"
%></h1>25: </div>26: <!-- /HEADER -->27:
#{RAILS_ROOT}/app/views/./layouts/administration.rhtml:24
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.11.2/lib/action_view/base.rb:268:in`compile_and_render_template'
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.11.2/lib/action_view/base.rb:244:in`render_template'
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.11.2/lib/action_view/base.rb:205:in`render_file'
#{RAILS_ROOT}/app/helpers/application_helper.rb:26:in `render_file'
#{RAILS_ROOT}/app/helpers/application_helper.rb:19:in `render_file'
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.11.2/lib/action_controller/layout.rb:226:in`render_without_benchmark'
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.11.2/lib/action_controller/benchmarking.rb:53:in`render'
/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/benchmark.rb:293:in `measure'
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.11.2/lib/action_controller/benchmarking.rb:53:in`render'
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.11.2/lib/action_controller/base.rb:854:in`perform_action_without_filters'
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.11.2/lib/action_controller/filters.rb:332:in`perform_action_without_benchmark'
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.11.2/lib/action_controller/benchmarking.rb:69:in`perform_action_without_rescue'
/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/benchmark.rb:293:in `measure'
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.11.2/lib/action_controller/benchmarking.rb:69:in`perform_action_without_rescue'
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.11.2/lib/action_controller/rescue.rb:82:in`perform_action'
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.11.2/lib/action_controller/base.rb:369:in`process_without_session_management_support'
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.11.2/lib/action_controller/session_management.rb:116:in`process'
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-1.0.0/lib/dispatcher.rb:38:in `dispatch'
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-1.0.0/lib/fcgi_handler.rb:141:in`process_request'
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-1.0.0/lib/fcgi_handler.rb:53:in`process!'
/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/fcgi.rb:600:in `each_cgi'
/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/fcgi.rb:597:in `each_cgi'
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-1.0.0/lib/fcgi_handler.rb:52:in`process!'
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-1.0.0/lib/fcgi_handler.rb:22:in`process!'
#{RAILS_ROOT}/public/dispatch.fcgi:24
On 3/17/06, cedric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> On my point of view, single blog
is just a particular case of a multi-blog> implementation. This should becomes
the default typo blog with a default> setting to "single blog" for all people
who want to install their personal> typo. But I don't know if it's possible...
if not there must be 2 different> typo branches.> It's just my humble opinion,
to bring some ideas to community.>> Le Vendredi 17 Mars 2006 18:00, Gary Shewan
a écrit:> > On 17 Mar 2006, at 16:19, Piers Cawley wrote:> > > "Kevin Kubasik"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:> > >> Just a note, I found that when attempting to
update to the> > >> latestTrunk, rev 915 breaks (it can't seem to add the new
blogs> > >> tablecorrectly) 914 is good though. It seems to me that a
multiblog> > >> branchshould be handled that way, in its own branch, not in
the> > >> trunk(although the comment seems to imply that it is being done in> >
>> abranch, maybe im just SVN illiterate)> > >> > > It's staying in the trunk
-- the comment about the branch was from my> > > local SVK based repository
which I'd not edited out.> > >> > > What errors were you getting when you tried
to run the migrations?> > > Could you send me a the relevant log section?> > >>
> > --> > > Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > > http://www.bofh.org.uk/> > >
_______________________________________________> > > Typo-list mailing list> >
> Typo-list@rubyforge.org> > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/typo-list>
>> > Sigh, well that's me not upgrading in trunk. Multi blog support is> >
bloat for those of us running Typo on single sites. I think it's a> > bad move
to keep this in trunk. If you want me to throw a penny in> > I'd say split it
now. The initial attraction of Typo because it was> > lean. Why keep multi
blog in trunk when not everyone wants it? It's> > screaming out for a separate
branch.> >> > God I hate bloat.> >
_______________________________________________> > Typo-list mailing list> >
Typo-list@rubyforge.org> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/typo-list>>
_______________________________________________> Typo-list mailing list>
Typo-list@rubyforge.org> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/typo-list>
--Cheers,Kevin Kubasikhttp://blog.kubasik.net/
_______________________________________________
Typo-list mailing list
Typo-list@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/typo-list
