On Feb 2, 2007, at 12:55 PM, mathew wrote:
I agree. I think HAML is a dumb idea, because it means you can't just edit your templates in a standard XHTML or XML editor.
Buh? Who edits HTML in an XML editor? Especially since the eRB escapes aren't, to my knowledge, real XML escapes and so I should be able to construct a valid RHTML file which isn't valid XML.
If typo moves to HAML, I drop typo, unless there's an HTML-to-HAML converter. I don't want to learn another markup language unless there's a really, really compelling reason. Making templates take up less characters is not that reason.
Why would you have to learn HAML? If we push out a stable Typo that uses HAML, we'll make sure themes can still use rhtml, so there should be no problem here.
-- Kevin Ballard http://kevin.sb.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tildesoft.com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Typo-list mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/typo-list
